Tyre reviews Bridgestone Alenza 001. Page 13 411

Everything is just fine with the Alenza, it's a very comfortable summer tire. By characteristics it completely satisfies, the response is sensitive. The resource is calculated for any precipitation, it's a rain, a downpour, hail... During the approach to winter, as now, it does not harden. In the summer in the hot weather it does not become too soft.

I drive every day, the flight is normal. Any road surprises are provided by the manufacturer, and also how the tire should react to them. Uneven load distribution, cambering, unevenness, puddles, everything is built into the program, the wheels are ready to overcome such obstacles without extra stress for the driver. At the wheel, I feel confident in my actions and in the fact that the car will behave predictably in any case.

I liked her multitasking and how she handles it. Got her in 17 on my wheel now, no longer sees the bumps, joints, small potholes for the car, large potholes also withstand, puddles, rain, and sometimes even snow (I also forgot to change shoes and was surprised that the wet snow was also within her capabilities).

I checked it on a rainy road and not too muddy, on the highway at 170km/h, in a city traffic jam. I was satisfied in all these situations - firm, handles the road well, like on rails, as well on wet asphalt as in the heat.

Summer tires, excellent handling, smooth ride, quiet enough.

It's time to leave a review about these tires, which were purchased in March 2019 at MosavtoShina. They were presented as a novelty at the time of purchase. Overall, I note that all the claimed characteristics are met. In fact, these are Bridgestone tires. At the same time, I note that the tire set cost much - 24,328 rubles, it's expensive. If you need excellent tires for the summer season, I would recommend buying this

Tires are super! I bought them as a replacement for the original Yokohama Geolander G 91. So, the original ones went for 62000, and people say that Bridgestone are noisy. Compared to Yokohama (and even the worn-out ones are always quieter than the new ones), the comparison is clearly not in favor of Yokohama. As for stiffness, I think Bridgestone is clearly softer, and as for handling, brakes, and aquap

Guys, I've read the reviews and I have to disagree. The tire is completely worn out after only 20,000 km, with 60% wear, maybe it's because the manufacturer is from Russia. I won't buy this crap again and I definitely wouldn't recommend it to anyone!!!!!

Fed up with changing tires due to blowouts, though the tread seemed to be good for another spin. Pulled the plug and went for the Bridgestone. And I disagree with those who say they're stiff and noisy. On the Blizzak, smooth and quiet handling, the car holds its line beautifully, no loss of control in the corner, stays put on the road.

Excellent tire. Initially, I inflated a bit too much and was unhappy with the significant camber, but then deflated to the recommended pressure and realized my mistake (usually I inflate a bit more to avoid wheel imbalance). Performs well on both dry and wet surfaces. The tire swallowed up potholes and other unevenness without any jolts. It's a stiff tire, I think the mileage before replacement will be big. It's a highway tire, haven't ridden on dirt yet, will