Tyre reviews Amtel Planet 2P. Page 4 136
- Rate
Read many negative reviews of these tires, but somehow they don't match reality. Neither on the highway nor in the city I did not notice any significant drawbacks that could say tires are complete crap. On the contrary, they confidently hold the road on highways at speeds of 120 and above, both on dry and wet pavement, they behave similarly on asphalt. Noise within normal limits (my normal, not talking about aesthetes and musicians). No bulges found in three years, wear a bit more
- Vehicle:
- Kia Spectra 1,8L 2003-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
These are some of the worst tires I have ever had. Handling is only acceptable in the city on dry asphalt. A bit of rain or above average speed - the tires are unpredictable. On wet asphalt, it's downright scary to drive. Scary to enter a turn on wet asphalt because the car skids like on ice.
- Vehicle:
- VAZ Priora (2170) 1.5L 2007-2009
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
After almost 5 years of use (including 2 winters), I've driven 90,000 km on 8 wheels. In the last 130,000 km, I've started to notice cracks. Handling is still decent at speeds up to 120 km/h in dry, wet, sandy, and winter conditions (on new tires). However, I always want more, so I decided not to buy a third set of tires; instead, I purchased a Yokohama set for the same
- Vehicle:
- VAZ Kalina (2119-2118) 1.5L 2006-2009
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
What I've noticed right after driving the "Bridgestone" tyre, it doesn't track well and feels like it's going to skid on dry asphalt, rather than swerving to the left like the "Michelin", that's my impression after 45 minutes of driving (I've just changed to the new set).
- Vehicle:
- Ford Focus 2 1,8TD 2004-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
They are average tires in almost all parameters.
I drove them for exactly 3 seasons. There is practically no wear. The tires are super wear-resistant. But instead, there are bulges on all wheels. Although I monitored the pressure.
At speeds above 120 km/h, they behave unpredictably and hold the road very poorly. It's also dangerous to steer on a wet road. Aquaplaning is minor, but present.
In the- Vehicle:
- Hyundai Accent 1,5TD 2002-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I've driven 30,000 km on these tires and the tread has almost completely worn off. The car always pulled to the left, I checked the alignment and everything was in order, I put on winter tires and the problem disappeared.
It holds the road not badly, and it grips well off-road.
The tires are normal for their price, but I won't buy them for myself again.- Vehicle:
- Kia Spectra 1,8L 2003-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Came with the car new. Now worn out, wanted the same one, but nowhere to be found in the right diameter, otherwise I would have taken it again. Can't say anything about winter. Now I have to read reviews about others.
off. Useful site))
- Vehicle:
- VAZ Kalina (2119-2118) 1.5L 2006-2009
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
For its price, it's good tires, no signs of wear after 25,000 km. On dry roads, it has proven itself to be excellent, but on wet asphalt - it's scary, above 80 km/h it doesn't hold the road, you can skid, and in a rut the wheel starts to live its own life. In general, you can drive, but in the rain - be careful
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2110 1.5L 1996-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
For such money, in principle, you can take
Tires at their price are not bad. Soft and very noisy. But what surprised me the most is that the first snow fell, and the Kalina has 175/65/14, I can get out of almost any snowdrift.
Pros: perfect price-quality ratio
Cons: noisy- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Rate
Summer-autumn active operation - like new after re-shoeing
I have nothing bad to say - like Soviet hi-fi
Pros: if you don't drive too deep into the mud - it will pull through
Cons: in winter on ice - it skids, holds asphalt like in summer- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance