Tyre reviews Amtel Planet 2P. Page 3 136

+ Runs well in mud/snow, strong sidewalls, quiet, wears slowly. Aquaplaning not noticed.

- After 10t, replacement is easy and it locks up easily and drags on startup in both rain and dry weather. Easy to skid on wet roads, slides out on corner on dry roads with a screech. The first 2-3t km on the highway emitted a smell of burnt rubber. Hard, picks up all stones and poth

(175/65R14) 7 years of use, 69,000 km of mileage, wear is approaching the control points, about 1 mm remaining. Taking into account that the discs are six-sided, I constantly balance with a hammer after driving in the Republic of Komi and Kirov Oblast. The discs are ideal for Russian roads, no cracks, no peeling tread, no visible cord separation. I drove on them in the summer on a Matador and Cam,

The overall quality is OK for the price, but it's very loud and doesn't handle well on wet roads. The noise is worse than on winter tires, but it does provide a sense of security when driving on slippery roads. Two of the rear tires were overinflated and I had to deflate them, while the front ones were fine.

Pros: good handling stability, good mud traction.
Cons: extremely noisy, poor dry asphalt traction - easy to wheel-spin when starting from a standstill, if there is no electric power steering, then the steering will be very firm and unpleasant.
In conclusion: not a city tyre, better suited for the highway, but if the noise insulation is good, otherwise - an airplane.

Excellent tires, drove 35,000 km on VAZ-2107, not a single complaint. They performed well on my service Volga, enough for intense driving, average 50,000 km. They hold potholes perfectly, I'm very satisfied with these tires.

Ran for 3 years only in the city, wear is minimal.
Very loud. Without music in the cabin, my ears ache already at 100 km/h, don't drive them in the winter! After the first snow, I drove home:), maybe I would have driven them even longer, but I caught a hernia after a pothole.
Anyway, for their money, it's serviceable!

I bought 4 tires, mounted them on steel rims. Rode 250 km and found a bulge on the rear right wheel. I don't know how I could have hit a rock with the rear wheel. I drive carefully. I think that a good tire would not have caused this problem. Rating - 100000

Not bad at all. Bought the car at the end of autumn, so I thought I wouldn't even put these tyres on and would sell them, but didn't manage to and put them on after the studs. So, the tyres aren't bad at all, they behaved normally on a wet road, no unpleasant surprises. Generally, those who are criticising them probably just criticise everything domestic. I like the tyre, it's quite reliable and comfortable.

I bought this tire with the car, thinking it was better than the Continental, but after driving it for the summer, I realized it's one of the worst tires I've ever had in 15 years of driving. It whistles when braking, doesn't hold turns well, and on a wet road, the braking distance doubles. I bought Nokian 4 for the winter and it holds the road better on ice at 100 km/h than the Amtel held on a dry road

Low mileage. I'd say they're just eternal (for small, non-taxi mileage). Hard and noisy. Otherwise, very acceptable. They don't float in the water, many prestigious brands would envy the fountain-like spray from the wheels, they dig in the dirt with gusto, and they stick to the track like glue even at 140 km/h. I've been reading reviews from other owners (thinking of changing to Tigar due to noise) but I'm coming to the conclusion that I