Tyre reviews Amtel NordMaster. Страница 3 142

Ran three seasons on them 20,000 km. Studs are almost all in place, tread is worn out slightly, no nubs, although I did hit potholes in winter and spring. They run great in the snow, also okay on ice, as for handling I won't say a thing since I don't drive above 120 km/h in the winter. As for noise, I'll say that my mother-in-law's Logans with Hankooks are just as loud,

The tires are not bad, I've driven them for 2 seasons - all the studs are in place. They are noisy. They brake and accelerate well on ice, and handle snow fairly well. I got stuck a couple of times, but even chains wouldn't have helped in those potholes)) They are significantly cheaper than others, but they are not much worse!

I've been driving on 2 tires of the 5th season, and on 2 tires of the 4th season (rear)
I'll tell you that over the winter I drive an average of 5,000 km, my driving style is intense, but not aggressive!
+ :1. good studs - more than 80 percent of the studs are in place, after 4 seasons of operation.
2. It holds the road fairly well

Punctured the Hakkapeliitta's wheels and couldn't find them in stores anywhere. Had to take 2 Nokian Nordman tires as a replacement. Installed them in the front. Took R16 for 2500 rubles per tire. Probably the best price/quality option. Everything was very much to my liking.

Posted the specifications.

Noise overshadows all the merits of ride quality
When speeding up, you feel like you're in a taking-off airplane.
Pros: good cross-country ability, no obvious signs of wear after two seasons
Cons: incredibly loud roar!!!

Overall, I'm very satisfied.
I'm going to install the 3rd season. Good grip in the city on asphalt, outside the city on rolled snow. It didn't let me down on hills. After 2 seasons, the wear is not significant. Of the drawbacks - noticeably noisy.
Pros: Good grip, low wear
Cons: Noisy

Terrible tires on wet asphalt and on dry as well

It doesn't brake at all on wet asphalt!!!!!!!!!! I got into an accident because of it in a harmless situation... On wet asphalt at 60 km/h and +1 degree, the braking distance was 43m!!!!!!!!!! and that's with good brakes. I got fined 2000 units because of it, the traffic police said I was driving 90!!! and you can't prove anything to anyone. I don't recommend

Normal tires for such a price!
I've been using them for the second season, the wear is imperceptible, it's scary to drive at high speed. Overall, the tires are normal.
Pros: Price, driving on snowy roads
Cons: Noise, handling on wet asphalt

Soft, good traction on snow, normally holds tire pressure, but noisy and studs come out in a week or two.
Not suitable for aggressive driving at all. For calm driving - quite decent tires for a small price...
Pros: Well-balanced, soft ride and good grip on snow and ice
Cons: Studs come out quickly, too much noise

Normal tires for their money

The tires hold the road well on snow, wet snow (slush) and ice. On dry asphalt, it's very noisy, since it's studded. It feels like when you accelerate, it's not your car that's accelerating, but some motorized plane next to you. On wet asphalt or cobblestones - be careful! You need to drive very carefully and preferably no more than 40 km/h. The braking distance is very long. Sk