Tyre reviews Toyo Tranpath S1 (TAS1) 47

I won't agree with negative reviews on this tire, as I personally drove on 215-70-16 on the Infiniti FX50 in 2008 and after selling it, on the Nissan X-Trail 2005, by the way, the tire behaves differently on different cars. The Infiniti FX50 is lighter than the X-Trail 2005, so, in my opinion, it's much better and has better braking and acceleration from a standstill, and the

Really good tire! It does a great job of holding on the road, and performs well in snow, quite predictable on ice (no studs of course). On asphalt at 160 it holds the road well and there is no noise. At speed (within reason) in puddles it doesn't leave the course. Exploited on Kamchatka (by the way). In general, I recommend. Many people here drive on this and are happy.

Excellent and quality tire. I've driven enough to evaluate this product. After reading reviews, I realized that people buy tires without understanding the usage. I also bought this same tire for my second car, SSY ACTION SPORTS. It handles well on any surface, but one drawback is that the tire starts to burn at high temperatures on asphalt. Car enthusiasts, warm up this tire first, and then try whatever you want. This tire should be warmed up to see its real capabilities. My rating is

I was surprised by the negative reviews of this tire. I installed it on a snowy day, the first snow of the season, and I was extremely impressed. It accelerates and brakes well on both snow and ice, and on the pavement it's normal, although it does feel a bit soft. The quality is high, it's a Japanese product, and it's well-balanced. I sold my car with these tires and the new owner was very complimentary. I can compare it to Nok

It's unclear what kind of winter these tires are designed for. They can't handle snow, and even less so ice, with a braking distance like a sled. It takes ten attempts to drive onto a wet curb. And that's on all-wheel drive! I sold them, couldn't drive anymore and continue to suffer. Ugh!

Excellent tire for late autumn and winter.

I drove 10,000 km from November to April on the Niva. The driving style is aggressive. The tire is not noisy, brakes perfectly on wet asphalt and well on ice. Very well holds against lateral skidding.

Holds well on any surface

Installed at the beginning of November, before the frost. In the rain and at a temperature of +10, it's too soft on hard surfaces. Although off-road, the car went no worse than a tractor. After the cold and snow, I felt all the charm. Acceleration and braking are very decent. By feeling - like studded tires. Probably, the additive of walnut shell is working after all. At moderate speeds, even on solid ice -

I'm not sure about this.....................

I agree with some authors. This miracle tire gives incomprehensible sensations. Given that I drive an Outlander with four-wheel drive, sometimes there is a feeling of discomfort and uncertainty, the tire is tense. NOISY!!!! On a wet road, it's okay, but on snow and ice, it's a complete failure!! There is no clear understanding with the car. I used to use Gislaved Nord Frost 3, drove

I will be waiting for an advertising miracle and the machinations of marketers

Installed on 29.11.2008. First impressions: Noisy compared to (Pirelli Winter Carvill) and noise insulation!!! VAZ 21099. The whole car is dirty, the lamellas do their job. I started making mistakes in the stopping point, and this is despite the fact that I have already adjusted to winter tires and the braking style on the service road. I drove from

Better than Dunlop SJ6

Quite soft, on asphalt and cobblestones predictable, slightly smeared reactions, which is what it should be, drives normally on snow, the colder it is, the more confident it is. On ice, you need to be more careful, especially if there is water on the ice, but this is also true for other tires, it's better to keep the pressure slightly higher than recommended, it won't affect comfort, but handling will improve.