Tyre reviews Nordman 4. Страница 2 448

Here is the translation:

Here, I decided to leave some lines about tires - maybe it will be useful for someone! I bought tires to replace the worn-out Bridgestones. I'm satisfied with the tires. The road-holding is amazing. I drove in the Murmansk and Arkhangelsk region. The grip is good on any surface, and the steering is predictable, unlike the Bridgestones. The traction on any snow at high altitude is excellent. With the front-wheel drive

I used this tire for 4 winters and it's performed very well. The studs are almost all still in place. Handling and braking are also good. My only regret is that last year I got a few potholes in the grooves, so I'll have to replace it eventually.

I bought these tires, went to the tire shop, they started balancing them and one tire had a radial vibration of 7mm, the other had 4mm, and the two other ones had zero. A week later, I got a side cut on the rim when I hit a pothole. I had to replace the rim. Recently, I hit a pothole and got a bulge, and it looks like the sidewall separated from the rim. After a day, the

Two seasons have passed on this tire. About 70% of the studs remain, and the "6" marking is still visible. No blisters have appeared over two years. It's hard to pinpoint the steering as I drive a family minivan calmly and carefully, but in familiar turns I occasionally allow myself a little extra and the tire holds up. Prior to it, I had a Hakkapeliitta 4 studded tire, which served for three seasons and was replaced due to wear and

Very convenient website ordered in Syktyvkar, all discussed with the operator and ordered winter tires, all arrived whole and undamaged, also bought disks from them.

Great tire! I've done 4 winters in mixed mode (city, track, forest). Only positive feedback. It's amazing on four wheel drive, allows to realize the full potential of the system. Totally as expected behavior. They don't make much noise, wear is quite predictable, but when you hit 140+kph the studs start to shed.

I got it from a friend in 2013 (he drove 2000 km on it from Moscow to Murmansk in April). I bought it with no money left, only bought a new Kuga. Went on a trip with my wife for one winter. Both of us have negative impressions. Before that, a Continental ContiWinterViking 2 was mounted on a 5-season Focus. Kuga with Nordman 4 is worse than a front-wheel drive Focus. The tire

Good tires. Tested them on the route from Moscow to Murmansk and back.
They hold the road well in various conditions. Never let me down.
As for the minuses... they're really loud, but you get used to it...
and aquaplaning could be better... otherwise 5 stars.

The 215/65-16 tyre was on two Schneiders, then I put a Nissan Terrano (the twin of the Duster).

No complaints with the tyre whatsoever. Only reason to give a 5. Does not drift, does not make much noise, over three seasons (around 15000km) 5-10 barbs from the wheel, the tyre itself is like new - not worn out much, comfortable, also no complaints with steering and braking.<

Quite good tires. I treated the tread with extra care, as with all studded tires, and was pleasantly surprised by the softness, handling, braking and consumption, and the acceleration was on par. The external noise is from the studs, and it decreases significantly over time. From the minuses: the sides, like all tires, are very soft, but if the softness of the tread is a plus, then the softness of the sides is a major minus. At 30 km