Tyre reviews Maxxis MT-772 Razr MT. Страница 1 20
Есть что рассказать о шине Maxxis MT-772 Razr MT?
Написать отзыв- Rate
Read this before buying, quite useful opinions. Decided to check it out, will write back. Tires were put on a Discovery 4 on 01 July 2020, diesel 2.7. Long hesitations about the noise and vibration...., but the memories of the agonies of the stormy hill climbs on fishing trips made me decide. The variant with AT is already definitely ruled out, after the second set of Japanese Toyo Open Country AT tires were worn out. The
- Vehicle:
- Land Rover Discovery 4
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Mounted 275/70/18 on a 150 PR. Got a 33.2. A bit of noise on the asphalt. Holds well on corner. Not beating the steering. Balances well. Gets worn down well. Puts traction on mud like Satan. Tire is on fire!!! Gravel is a breeze!
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Super rubber, previously was BF Goodrich - earth and sky, does not make noise, snow and ice behavior excellent, on mud fire.
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Land Cruiser 80
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Good for mud.
Pleasant appearance. No white lettering.
One of the few MTs designed for asphalt as well.
Wear resistance is good
Loud, heavy.
I've been choosing MT in the native size - 265/60-18 for a long time. The choice was small.
On the manufacturer's website, there are brochures, what kind of tire relates to what...
This one, according to the mud, can also drive on asphalt without wearing out much.
I drove up to a ditch, it grips perfectly on thawed mud, puddles.. Couldn't drive where even the 34th HT tire got stuck (swamp), and a car with AT tires was getting stuck all the time right next to me.- Vehicle:
- Toyota Hilux Revo
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Installed on the niva 205/80 16
The sound is nice, the noise increased by a minimum. On the highway, the consumption is 10l.
I drive in the woods for business, it's often muddy, until I get stuck, I drive carefully everywhere where I need to. I recommend.- Vehicle:
- ВАЗ 2121 Niva
- Size:
- 205/80 R16 110/108Q
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Nizhny Novgorod
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Good tires, soft, behave well off-road, not noisy on asphalt, the only minus is that they wear out quickly.
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Hilux
- Size:
- 33x10,5x15 114Q
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Noginsk
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Excellent tires, for a full-fledged SUV, a golden mean in all respects: off-road, in the city, in appearance, in handling. In 2019, I bought a set of size 315/70 R17 for 56,000 rubles, at that time Maxxis was not yet popular. Now the price is cosmic, the price is clearly overpriced, 100 thousand for a set is normal, 160,000 is already an overkill.
- Vehicle:
- Hummer H2
- Size:
- 315/70 R17 121/118Q
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Мурманск
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
This is a fairly decent tire, not noisy, understandably not a highway tire, but the noise is very moderate, with open windows you can barely hear it, at speed it behaves adequately, in principle, sometimes I drove 130-140, no unpleasant sensations, in serious mud of course it's not a Barnaul Forward, it gets dirty fairly quickly, but it's incomparably more comfortable.
- Vehicle:
- Tank 300
- Size:
- 265/70 R17 121/118Q
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Красноярск
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Very heavy tires increased fuel consumption.
- Vehicle:
- Dodge Ram 1500
- Size:
- 275/70 R18 125/122Q
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- City:
- Krasnodar
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Good as all maxis
- Vehicle:
- Tank 400
- Size:
- 285/65 R18 125/122Q
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Yaroslavl
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability