Tyre reviews Maxxis HP-M3 Bravo. Page 3 303

Time since purchase is short, so I can say confidently, there is almost no noise. Ruts are normal. Snow and ice were not, and they are winter ones. I drove in good mud, useless. On moderate mud it is smeared, but rides. After a snowstorm, it seemed soft. Less noticeable are joints, small potholes. Holds the road confidently, both dry and wet. In general, it's worth the money!

The tire was previously 225/55/18, it was too hard, I replaced it with 225/60/18. The car became a bit higher and softer. The ride and potholes pass much more comfortably, but at the cost of increased height. Handling on dry roads: goes well and confidently. Handling on snow: haven't had a chance to test it, and I won't be driving on snow with summer tires. Braking efficiency: adequate. Wear resistance: can

Good tire for a crossover. A bit stiff, but the price to quality ratio gives it clear advantages. Holds well on both dry and wet roads.

The tire is very good. I would buy it again.

I'm satisfied with the tires. There were many concerns about buying Chinese tires, but they proved to be unfounded. They balanced surprisingly well, to the amazement of the tire fitter. They handle the road wonderfully. There's no aquaplaning at all. They withstood the heat of +38 degrees Celsius with flying colors (there were concerns that they might be too soft, or that the sidewalls might be too thin, or that they would lose grip in our heat). And then, suddenly, there was a freezing rain and the road was covered with a layer of ice. They even handled that, although they're purely summer tires. Previously, I drove on Nokian, Cordiant, and Hankook tires. I didn't notice any difference. I'm very pleased that I decided to take a risk and buy Chinese tires, and not overpay a lot of money. As for the noise, I won't say anything - my car has good soundproofing, and I didn't even hear the Cordiant All Terrain, which many people think is very noisy. I plan to try Chinese winter tires next.

When purchasing, I chose the tires based on their tread life. I found that the manufacturer claimed a mileage of 120,000 km.

After buying the tires, I measured the tread depth - it turned out to be 8.4 mm. Over 6 years, the tires have run about 70,000 km - the remaining tread depth is 5 mm. The tires are excellent, all parameters are as stated.

I spent a long time choosing, read all possible reviews. Replaced bald Bridgestone, only positive impressions. Quiet, waterplowing stable, good braking. Doesn't track (after Bridgestone). The only drawback, as written, not for extreme driving. On a loaded car at high speeds with sharp braking may "whistle", and also on roundabouts at increased speed slightly skids outwards. But this is not critical and easily controlled. Physics is still in place. No wear

I bought Maxxis Bravo tires most likely because of the price. I didn't install them right away, only after a year, when I had worn out the old tire to the same height. I'm no expert, so I won't praise their excellent qualities. I'll just say that I like them! The new tire is great, that's all I have to say! The tread pattern looks good, it was balanced - to a minimum. I drive like an ordinary person, I don't

I bought this tire based on reviews.
Previously, I had Michelin Latitude Sport 3 for 12,500 roubles on 19-inch wheels.
Maxxis outperformed it in all areas, and that's a big difference.
The most noticeable thing is: cornering stability (even like driving on rails), wear ( Michelin wore out completely at 30,000 km). On Maxxis, the same wear resulted in a loss of

The worthy quiet tires from the cheap. Quality at the level of the brands. 255/55/19R in the course do not feel as confidently as some write.