Tyre reviews Bridgestone Turanza ER30. Page 3 542

Very good tires

Mazda 3 205/55/R16 installed from 0 - now 3000. Can't evaluate wear yet - mileage is too small, BUT, for example, - drove in the rain on Podolsky descent (cobblestone) at a speed of 120 - brakes perfectly, doesn't skid. On the highway - also in the rain - solid 5. On ice and snow - didn't try (-: And don't want to

Very bad tires
Honda Civic 2006, mileage 10,000 on Turanza, tread wear over 50%. Very noisy. Even at low speeds and dry pavement, ABS often engaged. When not very aggressively accelerating, it loses traction. Handles turns poorly. On a wet road - it's just deadly. I had it installed when I bought the car, I would never have bought it for money.
Pros: Not identified
Cons: Slippery, noisy,

Noisy. No confidence when driving on a wet road

Very "gentle" - the sidewall is torn in 2 places. It's hard to find a replacement, and if you do, you'll be shocked by the price. Nothing special - except the noise from the tires is so loud that it's unbearable. I know that Civic isn't Opel-Vectra in terms of noise, but when I changed to Michelin X-Ice, I realized that it's not

Aggressive

It stood as a standard on the car. Now it's winter. On winter tires through snowy mush and ice, I feel much more confident than in the summer with Turanza on wet asphalt and especially on cobblestones (even dry!). Noisy, stiff.

Noisy and stiff

It was installed from the factory on Peugeot 307, the impressions are strictly negative, the noise is simply off-scale, for comparison, the winter Fulda turned out to be much quieter. Constant ABS triggering during calm braking on dry asphalt, very stiff. Tires are only for perfect roads, only then they are quiet and good, on Moscow's " rough road" the ride is with the sound of a taking-off plane and "banging" on every crack

The worst tires I've ever had!!!

Tires are complete garbage, were on my Mazda 3 (series). Extremely noisy, hard, completely useless on wet roads, and several times it pulled on aquaplaning at 80-85 km/h!!! These are one of the worst tires I've had, and I've had: Goodyear, Continental, Michelin, Dunlop, Fulda. And the tires are original, not fake, as I've already said

Terrible tires!

The tire is just wooden. Acceleration is terrible: the car skids at the slightest acceleration. Braking is a weak three. Side drift is poor. Aquaplaning is terrible. Even on a wet road at a speed of 90 km/h, the car turns into an unmanageable projectile. Dirt is also not the element of these tires. Wear - even Matador MP14 at the same mileage looked significantly better! I'm in shock!

Holds the road confidently, but very noisy

It was installed on the Lancer-9 from the car dealership, bought the car in the spring. Drove until New Year's, and then gave up - what's the point until spring. Although I drive the car every day (need it for work), I still drove it until the next winter. But one day my patience ran out when I couldn't climb a long uphill in the fresh snow in the morning. The clean mileage on

Noisy

These tires were on my Fiesta when I bought it. Well, what can I say: up to 110 km/h, they are quite satisfactory. Of course, I didn't enter a turn on a wet road at 100 km/h, but otherwise, all maneuvers were performed without skidding. I consider the noise to be the main drawback. I can hear other sounds from the outside world in the cabin when the engine reaches 4,000 revolutions, but the tire noise

Bad, expected more!
This tire is far from Dunlop SP Sport Maxx and Kumho Ecsta SPt KU31! Tire for running-in cars and for beginners! Someone in the reviews really liked it, but it can only appeal to a person who drove on Zhiguli after the standard Camry or Rossava.
Pros: There are no advantages compared to what I compared
Cons: I'm tired of listing