Tyre reviews Triangle TR259. Page 83 2220

Excellent tires, very pleased, drove to the sea, drove on bad roads, did not fail!

Satisfied with the purchase. In assessing the characteristics, I did not note the winter performance, since the tires are for summer.

Soft

Excellent premium (no exaggeration) for a budget cost

Good tires. Correspond to the declared characteristics.

So far the review is positive. There were two punctures, a screw and a nail 2cm long. The tire deflated very slowly, after the plug, it held the pressure, I installed the plug, otherwise the repair prices are quite biting. On wet roads, it floats a bit, brakes normally. Overall, I'm satisfied, didn't expect the tires to be that good. I recommend.

Everything is fine, no worse than Kumho

Not noisy!!! Holds the road perfectly! … Like on rails

Ordinary tires without a hint of being mid-range.
I've driven 4000 kilometers on them. The disadvantages include:
1. Fuel consumption per liter has increased (the tire parameters clearly do not match the label)
2. A wobble has appeared - the tire has soft sidewalls. It's especially noticeable when braking
In other respects, they're fine - they have grip and ride smoothly
Previously, I drove 35,000 kilometers on winter Triangle tires, and they behaved better

Excellent, quiet tires, consumption is the same as on Bridgestone (which was on the car from the factory). It handles the highway perfectly, through puddles without aquaplaning, on wet asphalt - without complaints.