Tyre reviews Pirelli P6000. Page 1 944
- Rate
My wife drove 70,000 km (her second set after the originals) over the course of 4 years, mostly on good roads, so it’s worth the money. The pressure is held fairly well, with occasional checks every couple of months, a small top-up being required. The noise level is average, and, as with all tires, it depends on the tread.
- Vehicle:
- Honda Accord 2,0L 2003-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
Fantastic!
No matter what anyone writes, I have one opinion! The tires are simply SUPER!!! My tires are 8 years old, the tread remaining is about 3 mm. It handles just super, on a wet road like cast and never made me doubt it. To those who are thinking of buying these tires, I definitely recommend. I can only vouch for this particular size and front-wheel drive! Good luck to all.
- Rate
195/50 R16. Felt like a tank too. Dead silent, instant braking - and no wheel hop in the process. Impressed! Extremely precise steering. Sharp turns at high speeds without any slide or squeal. Super! I'd recommend it, even for such a price...
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2110 1.5L 1996-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought a GAZ 3110 with this tire, which had 55% wear, and I was shocked by its behavior on the road. On the mountainous road from Sochi to my home (26 km), it was glued to the road, without any slides, skids or whining. It served me for about a year and 20-25 th. km. And as for driving on snow and ice – you need to know how to do it!
- Vehicle:
- ГАЗ 31105
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Main use only for track in summer (over +10). Handling and braking ideal, and therefore quickly worn out (small resource). Low rolling resistance. Fuel economy up to 1L per hundred. Minus: weak sidewall. Narrow range of application. Several sets are worn out.
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Avensis 2,0L 2003-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Pros:
- The most "soft" summer tire.
- Confidently holds the car through corners, without squeals or wheelspin.
- Reliable in extreme braking, simply bites into the road.
- Excellent behavior on wet and rainy asphalt, no aquaplaning even with 30,000 km of wear.
- Strong sidewall, for those who like to jump over speed bumps.
- Average price category.
- Vehicle:
- Honda CR-V 2,0L 2004-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Good tires but too expensive for the performance they offer. 37,000 kilometers and they are at the end of their electronic life without tread but I think it's normal for a mountain use, even more so with a turbo diesel pair. If they were cheaper (I would buy them again maybe) I would buy them again. Now I prefer Toyo Proxes T1R or Kumho Ecsta SPT KU31. They consume more
- Vehicle:
- Fiat Punto HGT
- Size:
- 185/55 R15 V
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
Completely satisfied with the purchase, the price was good and the performance of the tires is brilliant. I've covered a reasonable mileage with very little, if any, noticeable wear to the tread. I would definitely purchase the same tires again and, without hesitation, recommend to anyone to buy.
- Vehicle:
- Jaguar S- Type 2.5Ltr V- 6
- Size:
- 225/55 R16 ZR
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
2004 MODEL 110,000 miles completed on 3.5 SETS OF TYRES AFTER car was new, mixed FAMILY MOTORING PLUS HIGH uk motorway USAGE.NO PROBLEMS in adverse weather CONDITIONS AT ALL INCLUDING slight snow Excellent all round.
- Vehicle:
- Ford MONDEO Zetec 2.00 tdci 130
- Size:
- 205/55 R16 V
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
Honestly, reading around the opinions here I was prepared for the worst... I read about people who went straight to the curved, or people who lost stability over 90 rainy days. Then, feeling these tires, I discovered that those who spoke poorly of the P6000 were only intended for inexperienced drivers who can't handle, first, switching to 90 in wet conditions, second, braking and turning downhill is a matter of science fiction... I was very pleased and reassured on long trips, good
- Vehicle:
- BMW 318 ti
- Size:
- 205/65 R15
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability