Tyre reviews Bridgestone Blizzak WS50. Page 1 33

Hello! I decided to write an review about this Blizzak WS50 tire. I've been driving on this tire for the second winter, and last year there was a lot of snow - the car drove perfectly on freshly fallen snow up to 15-25 cm in height, and I didn't notice any wheelspin. It gripped the road well on dry asphalt, and I accelerated up to 200 km/h. On wet asphalt and snowy slush it drove normally but not exceptionally.

Worthy, but once regretted not being studded.

Ran two winters. Once scared when on very slippery ice it didn't want to brake before a turn. But then it gripped the road and normally entered the turn. Got very scared and even a little regretted buying it. But maybe any tire, even studded, would have slipped there. Enters ruts easily, exits with difficulty. Reacts very strangely when the left and right wheels have different road surfaces:

Excellent winter tires (snow, ice, slush)

The first season of operation. I read the previous review about slipping on ice - probably because the tire width is small, and also because the car is VAZ (no offense). I haven't encountered better traction on ice and compacted snow (I had experience with Fulda Kristall Montero 2, GoodYear Eagle Ultra Grip GW-3, Nokian Hakkapeliitta Q). It reminded me of Nokian

For the city or a mild winter, it's not bad tires
Strong tires, many times I've driven into decent potholes at speed on them, sometimes even while braking - sidewalls are intact.

I don't know what's next

Hello everyone, I bought these tires this year, the seller, as always, praised them (you won't find anything better, the most worthy tires), I believed him and decided to buy more in September. Well, now it's November, and it's time to change them. After changing, I was satisfied (quiet, soft) but on wet asphalt, it feels like I'm on skates, and then I wondered what it would be like

I bought used tires in the fall and was initially satisfied: very quiet, soft, and did well on wet roads (mainly driven in the city at speeds around 50 mph). When the first snow fell, it wasn't bad either, but when the snow melted and ice appeared, I decided to change the tires, bought Michelin X-ICE and don't regret it, still, the Bridgestone on a slippery road is just average, and the stopping distance is too long.

185x65x14 - made in Japan,

holds the road well everywhere, on ice it's very predictable and smoothly goes into skid and also smoothly comes out of skid,
on a punctured wheel drove 5km straight at a speed of 80, didn't notice that it was deflated, felt it in a turn - drove another 3 km home - had a patch made by vulcanization - and everything is fine again.

Excellent tire

drove in winter on Mercedes C-180, despite rear-wheel drive, did not experience any traction problems even on ice, behaves very well on snow, if you drive most of the time in the city in winter, then in my opinion, there is no better alternative (the price is unbeatable). The noise level is simply negligible, at least my summer tires Conti Eco 2 seemed noisier to me, in my opinion (the most important thing is to install the

Good tire

Used on all-wheel drive Subaru Outbak. Rolled out the season without complaints, behaves perfectly both on rolled and freshly fallen snow cover. The previous Bridgestone DMZ-3 and Michelin Max ice tires did not concede in either acceleration or braking. Very sturdy sidewall, withstood such potholes in the spring that I didn't even hope it would survive.

Pros: Confident driving on any surface.

can't get any better!!!!!!!
Excellent tire, I'm using it, and I don't even want to hear about studs, last winter I almost got into an accident, if I had studs I would have crashed, but with this tire it's great, thanks for the excellent tire!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pros: holds the road well, goes through mud like a tractor, doesn't absorb water and disperses it!
Cons: significant wear when driving on dry road without