Tyre reviews Cordiant Sno-Max. Page 5 296
- Rate
I've been running this tire for 3 seasons, mounted on the front, with all studs intact! I would confidently recommend it as one of the best "winter" tires! I'll be buying more, only that it's getting harder to find this tire in stock ((
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2110 1.5L 1996-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
The tires are not bad, compared to YOKOGAMA (studded).
After the first season, all the studs are in place on the driving wheels, unlike YOKOGAMA, which lost -5 studs from each wheel, and Cordiant is on a 190 hp car, while YOKOGAMA is on a 150 hp one.
Cordiant starts and brakes well on rolled snow and asphalt with an ice crust, and has good braking on clean dry- Vehicle:
- Nissan Cefiro 2,5L 1994-2000
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I must say that I own two sets: R13 (186/65) and R15 (205/60) Only positive emotions!!!
Very wear-resistant!!! Noisy at first (500 km), but then it gets used to!!! In 3 seasons on 4 wheels, only - (minus) 3 studs!!! On ice, in snow, on asphalt - Everywhere it behaves confidently!!! Price-quality is the best! I can compare it with Gislaved NF3... absolutely
- Vehicle:
- Gaz 3102(3110) 2,4L 1996-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Excellent tire. Compared to Amtel Nordmaster (the only one I can compare it to) - the difference is in the best direction: it digs and brakes better, and makes less noise (somehow different, but still too much). The front axle is prone to skidding. Sometimes you have to slow down in a turn (and it's highly undesirable to do this on front-wheel drive!) so that the rear can catch up a bit, then accelerate again so it doesn't spin out
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2110 1.5L 1996-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
One season rode perfectly, on asphalt, though, it's very noisy, but on snow and ice it's pretty good. In the second season, they couldn't balance it properly, radial runout appeared, which cannot be corrected with any weights. As a result, when driving on a smooth asphalt road at a speed of over 40 km/h, the car slightly rhythmically "bounces". I will never take Russian-made tires again, it's too expensive for me!
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2110 1.5L 1996-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I'm using them for the second season. I bought them because I didn't have the money, and the season had already started. Previously, I drove on imported tires. I chose the tires based on my own experience, selecting them by tread, softness, weight, and rubber quality. I remain satisfied, and I wonder why I used to waste my money on imported junk :)
- Vehicle:
- Renault Megane 1,4L 1999-2002
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
The price-quality ratio is the most optimal
an excellent tire for its money (1400 rubles for R13), works perfectly on ice (outperforms Hakkas 5), also goes great on loose snow, and so far, it's been impossible to get the car stuck with this tire.
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Haven't found better with such a low price for tires
I bought 195/65R15 for Megan II last year, the price was around 2100 rubles per tire. I'm completely satisfied with them. I was especially surprised by the acoustic comfort on asphalt - before that, no matter how much I drove on domestic studded tires, I had to plug my ears...
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
Excellent, quiet traction and braking
I drive on them in winter just like in summer. I've driven 35,000 km on this tire, with only positive impressions. I've been looking for a single downside, and found one: it's a bit uncertain on ice rinks (possibly weak side lugs). There's nothing else to complain about. The impressions are only positive. Previously, I had Kama Euro, Hakka 4 (twin of Snow-Max).<
- Rate
Normal tires, given away by the dealer as a gift with the purchase of the car, I've just ordered 2 more tires as I blew the two I had through my own stupidity.
- Vehicle:
- Hyundai Creta
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability