Tyre reviews Cordiant Sno-Max. Page 2 296
- Rate
Зима в этом году выдалась суровая. В заснеженных дворах благодаря шинам мог парковаться)).За сезон ни одного выпавшего шипа - приятно.
- Vehicle:
- Kia Rio X-Line
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought Cordiant Snow-Max 205/65R15 in October 2016. I have already driven 5 seasons and around 70,000 km. I very much like the tire. At the moment, two out of the three tires have 10-15 studs missing, and one has 3 studs missing. I got stuck only when I drove on the side.
On another car there are Gislaved Nord Frost 200 tires, such rubbish I have never
- Vehicle:
- Mazda 3
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Rides well only straight ahead.
Slips when turning at any speed.
Makes a noise above 25 mph.
I would not recommend, without a doubt.- Vehicle:
- Lada Samara
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Pros: price, tires are good, soft, well-grip road: dry asphalt, rain, snow, ice.
Cons: slightly noisy, after 100 km/h, when splashing into a puddle there is a slight aquaplaning!- Vehicle:
- Kia Venga
- Size:
- 205/60 R16 96T
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Installed the tires about a month and a half ago. Had only a week of freezing temperatures, not much snow yet... Holds the road well, a bit noisy but that's not a factor for city driving. We'll see how it performs once the snow melts.
- Vehicle:
- Renault Sandero Stepway
- Size:
- 205/60 R16 96T
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Severodvinsk
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Good tires.
Go well in snow. Behaviour on ice predictable.
Slightly noisy, but not critically so.
After two seasons, all studs are still in place.- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi Outlander
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
When purchasing this tire, I was primarily influenced by magazine reviews and recommendations from friends. Knowing our roads, I try to choose the most reliable. I've driven over 20,000 kilometers, I can say that I've never let me down, holds the road perfectly, even in emergency braking.
- Vehicle:
- Ford Fusion
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Advantages: Low price, extra load no more than 30g - now it does not "bite".
Increased width of the tread grooves (compared to models of other manufacturers) - good for snow!
Disadvantages: Really, until you get used to it, it leads a bit on studded tires.
Noise appeared in a range of frequencies, as if I had switched to a "diesel".
Due to the presence of "- Vehicle:
- Nissan Terrano 1 2,5D 1987-1993
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Very good tyres, and if you consider their price, then they are simply great.
I took Chevrolet Cruze for three seasons - wear did not exceed 15%.
Of course, you have to take into account that I drive quite carefully, without skidding.
It holds well, both on the snow, and on the ice. And there are no problems on dry asphalt either.
Noise level is high.
Even when I had Kalina, which- Vehicle:
- Chevrolet Aveo 1,6L 2004-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought these tires in November 2011. The cost was 4,300 RUR per unit. I drove on them for 3 winter seasons. I sold them along with the car now.
3 winter seasons. On asphalt, they are sufficiently noisy, but they hold the road well. I lost no more than 10 studs on the fronts.
I often had to drive on snow and ice, since I live in the Moscow region. There were no serious complaints. They also
- Vehicle:
- Citroen Berlingo 1,6L 2002-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability