Tyre reviews Bridgestone Potenza RE050. Page 2 504

I think that $250 for a tire is an overpriced cost
I bought the RS with it already installed, in principle, it didn't let me down, after the non-studded AVS winter tire, the sensations are that it's noisier. I can recommend it if the price suits you.
Pros: Good handling
Cons: wear

Average

Well, let's start with the fact that reviews from Mazda owners, we Subarists will not take seriously... Now for the substance. There are two cars, one on Dunlop 9000, though on a 16-inch radius, the other - in this size Potenza. The first one clearly wins, especially in the limit on aquaplaning. Once I almost floated while driving at 3000 km...Sideways... Although I was driving absolutely moderately, in

Normal tires

Absolutely normal tires, slightly stiff. Worn out on wet roads start to float around 75-80 km/h, however, considering the wear, it's probably normal. The limit of traction properties in the transverse direction is well felt and occurs quite late (for example, the Dunlop 9000 reaches it 20 km/h earlier :-). In general, if I can get them for a reasonable price, I'll buy them again. I put them to the test

Good tires
The new car from the factory had them installed, the rubber is very stable at speed and in turns, but on bad roads it's quite noisy. I recommend if the price is not overpriced

For me, the braking distance is very important, which is 3-4 meters less for this tire compared to many other tires

The original needed RFT but these normal tires provide much better handling.

After approximately 40,000 km, the tires started producing an unbalanced sound (wowowow) at low speeds.

Good tire, better on dry than rain, quite comfortable, even if it's sporty, but it gets a bit noisy

Great tire, good grip in any conditions, it's a pity they wear out so quickly. I will be going back to RE720, better to wear out with similar grip.

I'm on good tires, but the RE 720 is better for the same price.