Tyre reviews Amtel Planet DC. Page 2 119

They have gone 60000 miles in five years. No complaints whatsoever. I compare them to Bridgestones, Yokohamas and Dunlops. The tyres are very worthy, may not suit some people, but do not recommend going into a turn at more than 120 km/h on any of them. Between them and the Bridgestones, I put an "=" sign. As for the noise, I will say that it all depends on the car's own soundproof

Parked normally on Lada Kalina Sport 1.4. Clearly better than "Kam-217" in all parameters, the summer Dunlop on my previous 21103 doesn't feel like it's any worse. Slightly noisy (though much quieter than "Kam"), the tread holds up very well, gave them a "1" in winter conditions since I don't drive in winter on summer tyres in principle. All in all, normal, cheap tyres.

The tire, in my opinion, confirms the well-known Russian thesis "We wanted it better, but it turned out just like always." The characteristics are pretty even, at a decent middle level, and there are no obvious failures in the summer disciplines (what else do we need?). Handling, course stability - good, braking in the rear - effective, but the tire is less suitable under ABS. Wear resistance, considering dynamic driving - decent (after 20,000 km - half the tread), resistance

The tyres came with the car. I don't know the mileage but I've already driven 60,000 km on them for the past three years. These tyres are very durable. Despite the driving style not being ideal, they still hold up well. My friend's Civic 4D, which runs on imported tyres (around R 5,000 each), had to be replaced after three years (60,000 km) as they were worn out. Of course, the tyres are not noise

The tire is poor. In terms of handling and braking, with a moderate driving style, everything is fine here, both on dry and wet asphalt. As for aquaplaning, I can say that it does not occur up to 70 km/h, and I do not drive faster through puddles. However, when it comes to comfort, the high noise emitted by these tires is a major drawback. The winter studded Kumho tire is even quieter. The second major drawback is that after

Who writes well on mud has not seen mud. The distance of driving on mud depends on the speed of entering the mud.
And in the countryside, you can jump over a puddle even with a YA380 and cheaper
Skids on dry roads, hydroplanes on wet ones, didn't have time to replace before snow - trouble.
I'll buy this tire again, I love risk
Where they cost 1 - consider it as 0

Real rubber for real money

On a dry road, they are good on straight and in turns, but the outer part on the front started to wear out (toe-in is normal). On a wet road, and especially on a dirty road (sand, clay or something else on top of the asphalt), it openly starts to understeer. They only make noise on wet surfaces. The sidewalls are strong at speeds far over 100, I hit such potholes that it seemed

For such money, excellent tires

This is a tire with good properties of SUMMER tires. My car has a stiffer suspension, gas shock absorbers, and the load on the sidewalls is serious, but these wheels handle it. Even at 190 km/h, it holds the road perfectly.

complete garbage

Tire is crap, bought at ATL store. First season was fine, after winter storage (left on rims in a warm garage), stopped balancing. At speeds over 120, it hits the steering wheel like on square discs, although the discs are cast and fine, I checked. A friend bought it in 14-inch size and after 3 months it went into small cracks. At the ATL store, with a receipt, they told me to screw off.

Pros

excellent

You need to drive with your mind, not with your eyes wide open and not seeing the road. As they say, there are two misfortunes: fools and roads. And the tires are not to blame, they are good. I installed two Amtele and two Goodyears at the same time, and after two years, there was not even a living tread left from the Goodyears, while the Amtele is still alive. Today I bought all 4 new ones.<