Tyre reviews Росава Бц-43. Page 1 22

I'm quite satisfied with the tires

I bought 21154, it had VS-43 on it, didn't change it, although I had the opportunity.... I've driven 43,000 km in 22 months... In general, I'm satisfied with the tires, and the speed characteristics were good, I drove at 185... in snow and rain... but ice is ice, and it's not a winter tire, after all... No bulges or ruptures ...super!

Strange wear

I was driving in a normal mode, VAZ-21061. There was a pair at the back. For some reason, the tread was worn out on the edges, and much less in the center. I can't say that I was always driving with underinflated wheels or overloaded. I definitely go for a top-up once a month. Apart from myself, I rarely have a couple of passengers.

excellent
Great tires for the price-quality ratio. Operated on VAZ-21103. Greatly survived two summer seasons in the Vladimir region. Total mileage 40,000 km. Very stable in skids. Not afraid of water (hydro strikes) at high speeds.
Advantages: stability against skidding at high speeds

Excellent

I've already driven over 35,000 km on my VAZ 2107, both in the city and on the highway to Kiev, and it has also performed wonderfully on the Crimean serpentines at speeds of 100-120 km/h. It also handles water perfectly and predictably. Take it, you won't regret it. And now I want to try the VS-42, it looks great, I'll try it and tell you about it.

Good tires
drove 50,000 km on Daewoo Lanos with BC43. In winter, drove on unplowed roads with up to 20cm of snow. Handles puddles and turns well. Had: a sidewall cut (?) and a sidewall bulge too.
Pros: snow, rain, turns
Cons: thin (?) sidewalls

For its price - quite decent

Operated on VAZ-09. I drive very aggressively, I pay little attention to potholes/rails/curbs. I don't spare the car or the wheels. I had thought of taking Michelin Energy, but after clarifying my driving style, the sellers convinced me to take Rosava. And that's despite the fact that they already had the money for Michelin in their hands.

Generally satisfied.

I drive a 2108, installed the VS 43, liked the tread pattern, drove on front-wheel drive for three winters in Odessa, snow, rain, mud, and honestly, I didn't particularly regret the lack of winter tires, to be honest, I drive quite aggressively, I think imported tires of this kind wouldn't have withstood such treatment. I bent the rims several times, but not a single puncture, now it's time to change them

For the money that Vana costs, it's hard to find a better option

A normal tire, previously had Tigar-620 as a standard, didn't notice any significant difference. On the highway at high speed, the car doesn't wobble, doesn't make noise, on a wet road, there are no complaints either, the braking distance is even shorter than that of the American Tigar-620. Didn't notice any significant wear on the sides. Didn't get a single

No tire

The tire is hard, noisy (after taking off Gislaved nord frost in winter) and it feels like sound insulation should be installed in three more layers :), on a speed of 70-80 it sings an unknown song. It's not bad at turning on wet roads and braking (if you smoothly load the front), I want to replace it. The front tire wore out by 2/3 for 10 thousand...

Oak rubber

Stood on the new 21144. Driven for 2 seasons. In winter, very bad. Becomes very stiff in the frost, becomes dangerous to drive. On ice, it almost doesn't hold. It immediately seemed that the tire is too noisy and stiff. A hum appears at a speed of around 100 km/h. The steering wheel is very hard to turn (without power steering), on winter (other brand) it's much easier. It holds the