Tyre reviews Росава SQ-201 39

Optimum price/quality ratio
Took it for 180 UAH. Behaves very predictably. On dry pavement, there are no complaints. Quite comfortable, at a pressure of 0.21 MPa, it absorbs bumps just like Barum at 0.19 MPa. So far, I'm satisfied.
Pros: Good directional stability, short braking distance, doesn't skid on turns.
Cons: Noisier than Barum Brilliantis,

Water + mud + its durability ++++++++++++++
Noise and comfort its drawbacks
Good for mud and wet roads
I bought 4 tires 195/65/15 for 120 rubles, used them for 55 thousand kilometers, sold for 50 rubles. Super

Normal tires!

I've driven 1500km in various conditions (rain, etc.). The tires are normal. In terms of noise, I don't see any differences with the winter Toyo tires that I inherited. I was afraid that they wouldn't balance, but the store told me that they would take them back if there were any problems. I took a risk. The tires balanced perfectly (I have alloy wheels).

Operating experience - 4 years. The tire is decent, strong and durable, it drains water well, hydroplaning occurs somewhere after 100 km/h (KIA Magentis). Our roads are generally able to withstand it, but in the event of a strong impact, the internal cord may be damaged and the wheel will not balance. Due to the hardness of the tire, be careful when it rains, when the road is not yet saturated with water and is covered with a mixture of water

For the price, it's a pretty good tyre.
After the camber adjustment, the car is unrecognizable, heaven and earth, less noise, better handling, and course stability too.
In general, if the money is a bit tight, I bought it for 1600 rubles per tire, and it's worth buying, it's probably better in this Zenoy category than the Cordiant Comfort.
The only minus is that it starts to make a bit

Bought a car about 2years ago with a worn-out summer tire Rosava SQ in the rear. Had been driving on it for no less than 25thousand km, while the tread at the time of purchase was worn out by 50%. Had also driven other cars on Rosava and not only, so I have something to compare it to (imported analogues on our roads are deflated and get potholes). Am satisfied with the tire, it's worth its money

I've just put on new SQ-201 (Rosava) tires, made in Ukraine.
I had Rosava tires (can't remember the model) on the previous set, and I drove 55 000 km on them. (It's possible that I drove more, but I didn't get a tire geometry check in time, and as a result I ruined 2 front tires).
I've replaced all 4 tires and kept the 2 rear ones as sp

I've been reading the reviews and I just don't get it – I've never encountered a tire that's this bad. I used to think that the Camu wasn't exactly a tire, but this one is a complete zero. Either you've never driven on a normal tire or you're a patriot from Ukraine who's driven 30,000 km on this tire and it's still somehow holding up. The noise level is unbearable – I regret buying it the moment I put it on. The

European quality of our manufacturer!
Took on Chevrolet Aveo2, satisfied! genuinely satisfied! got into rain, no downpour - behaves excellent, even when hitting a pothole (with our roads). Take it, don't be afraid, not worse than foreign manufacturers, which I preferred before.
Pros: Safe
Cons: Noisy at high speed, like all in principle

Wow! Didn't expect that!

I almost randomly chose between Kumho 727 (185/65/13) for 333 UAH and Rosava SQ-201 (175/75/13) for 212 UAH. I flipped a coin and it landed on Rosava. My impressions are very positive. The first thing I noticed was the softness. Before, I was driving on Barguzin #4, which felt like a stool, and I thought I'd have