Tyre reviews Росава Бц-20 57

Good
Installed on IZH 412. 40 thousand kilometers passed and both on the rear axle and in the front, the wear is almost the same. No bulges, although it was operated quite harshly. I think that what is supposed to come out of it, comes out and even more!
Pros: Durability, highway, mud and winter are not scary
Cons: Noisy - not very loud but noticeable

In the summer, it might just work!

In the summer, until the first frost, you can still drive, but not more than 2 seasons, but as a rule, after the first season, it starts to lead to tire wear, large radial imbalances, possibly plus the fact that for the shoulders it's just right... but only if you don't repeat this action too often.

Noise tyre. Has already been run for over 10,000 km. Noted unusual vibration during braking (this stopped after switching to winter tyres). Is wearing out with some sort of stains. Performs well on the dirt, in dirty puddles grips well. At negative temperatures behaves like a summer tyre. Can be used on dry asphalt in frost (with moderate braking).

Rubbish not tyre. Bought in winter 2007, the first winter went well. But on the second winter it was one disaster. The car with this tyre becomes hard to handle in any weather. The steering wheel shakes, the car floats, in general, it's all sorts of troubles. I don't recommend buying.

A decent budget tire

At work, there are two company cars - two seven-year-old Volgas in almost the same condition. One is equipped with BC-20, the other with KAMA-205. The first one feels more confident on loose snow and minor dirt. It's noisy, especially at speeds above 110. After a year of operation, it becomes harder. KAMA 205 is less noisy, better holds the road. It's softer than the first one, due

beautiful tires
beautiful tires, you just need to buy 2 new ones every year and swap the new ones to the driving wheels, and the ones that have been driven for a year to the driven wheels. And that's just for sure. They can easily last 2 years even with intense use. Well, and the noise - it's a secondary thing. On our roads, it doesn't matter.
Pros: quality and price
Cons: naturally - increased noise.

After this tire, I thought about switching to an imported one.

After the first winter, it became stiff. It brakes poorly on dry concrete. On wet asphalt and puddles, it's terrible. Even at 50 km/h, it floats on puddles. The handling is poor (like on pillows), and it's hard to park (the steering wheel is tight, even with a pressure of 2-2.1 atm.). On dry asphalt and ice, it's normal,

At this price, excellent
I drove a VAZ-2106 for 2 years on this tire, for 2 winters, it skidded once and that was my fault, I drove up any hills. I drove 50,000 km.

A good budget option without pretensions

driven for 3 years about 60 thousand km all year round. with a moderate driving style, the residual tread height is more than 50%. not a single puncture, cut or other damage. more than once drove at a speed of under 100 km/h in heavy rain. aquaplaning is high! well, in winter, the tires, of course, become harder and become quite dangerous at high speeds. didn't skid

The ideal option for a budget all-season, grips well in mud and snow. A bit noisy. But in its price category, it's the perfect option