Tyre reviews Marshal KL71 Road Venture MT 84

Good day, I decided to write a review about this tire model. I will compare this model with the same Kumho and BF KM 2, which I installed two years ago on a Toyota Surf 92 in the size 33/10.5 15.

The experience of using KL-71 is quite extensive. The first time I installed it was on a SangYong Cayron in 2011, which was a Kumho KL-71 in the size 285/75

Soft and good off-road tire. For this price there are no alternatives. I had a Cordiant Off-Road (bought along with the car) beforehand, it's no match. On mud and dirt roads, it's as if a tank. It leaves the track. I'm satisfied.

Hello reader. Don't judge me harshly, this is my first review. After long searches and exhausting reading of articles, I decided to buy this tire. It's a very good value for the money. It was well-balanced, not more than 100g per wheel. I drove about 15,000 km, most of it on asphalt (about 11,000 km), then about 3,000 km on sand, and the rest on potholed roads, rocks and

The tire was purchased in size 265/75 R16 for a first-generation Mitsubishi Pajero Sport. For those interested in a tire that allows you to drive without a lift. Suitable for fishing trips and dacha trips. I am generally satisfied with the tire. At first, I was afraid that it would be impossible to drive in the city because of the noise, but it's not. It is quite comfortable to drive up to 100 km/h in terms of noise - no louder than

Hello, the tyre is quite okay on the highway, the noise is average, at a speed of 140 I don't notice a difference with highway tyres, when accelerating there is a hum, but with this pattern it's normal, the Goodyear hums no less. The powerful tread protects against punctures, I drove over an acacia bush (the previous tyres got a puncture), the dirt passes normally, I was pleased that it didn't eject the bonnet at the windscreen

Not a bad budget tire, justifies its price for the money. In the summer and demisaison, in the city as well as on off-road, behaves perfectly well, but in the winter difficulties arise, it's very afraid of black ice.

Good tire. Especially the price-quality ratio. Last season's operation on heavy stone trails showed that this tire can hold its own against well-known brands.

I bought it in the summer, it's normal for muddy roads, they grip, you get up to 0.8 kg and it's super! Now I'm driving during the winter, on loose snow it grips perfectly, on ice it's honest, it's not great, but on frosty asphalt it's good too, but don't forget it's an MT tire, it's better to get it if the car has permanent four-wheel drive, it's for winter!

Deep tread, soft, quiet, self-cleaning and, of course, a nice appearance :)

These tires are on my Niva, they replaced Cordiant OF Road 225/75/16 (29), and they make for a much better and more confident ride. For an experiment, I drove into a deep puddle with a hard bottom and from a standstill with all wheels spinning, the Cordiants sank in and then started moving, while the KL71 "jump

Not bad tires, I took them in size 2157515, there is a pair, but
1. With high mileage, the front tires wear unevenly
2. When I bought the first set of tires, I got one from an early batch and the quality was worse (there were pieces of mold on the tires), which made the tire noisy
3. The tires are heavy, not all rims can balance the wheel properly, surprisingly
4. On sand, it behaves unpredictably, typical for MT, here the tire pressure and slow driving are important.
Now for the pros
1. The tires justify their name, MT, they drive well on mud, confidently, thanks to the side lugs, and they get out of the rut quite well.
2. They handle off-road driving quite well, it turns out to be a decent one
3. The tire is not too noisy, it can be used as an everyday tire if you don't overdo it
4. Relative cheapness and decent off-road capabilities
As a result, it turns out to be an average tire for driving on mud and a bit on asphalt