Tyre reviews Kumho Solus KH17. Page 4 620

I've been driving on passenger cars since 1984. I've had to ride on all sorts of tires, the latest being "Barguzin," "Kama," and "Michelin." The most pleasant for me so far have been the K-N-17. Quiet, very quiet, economical, grippy, no tracks for them, they brake perfectly both in dry and wet weather and so on. The driving style is calm, but not always. I consider the tire to be

Tire is AMAZING!!!
I've tried a few tires, can't really compare, but these just blew me away.
Before this I had the Kamaz-217 (with a spare), drove 1000 km and replaced with the Kumho KH17.
I chose these tires thanks to this resource, to all car enthusiasts and professionals who have already broken them in and didn't bother to leave a review.
You won't regret it.

I bought these tyres after the original Continental ContiEco Contact CP tyres, which were very soft, quiet, grippy in both dry and wet conditions, and impossible to get into a slide. After the Continentals, I'm sleeping with these tyres, and the price-quality is superb.

Well, I was looking for a set of wheels. Overall, the tires were very good. Before this I drove on a kamaz-217, kamaz-208, amtel-2R, goodir (I write only for summer tires). On another car I drove on Michelin Primacy N2, Michelin Pilot Sport, Dunlop 2050, so there's something to compare it to. The pros: they almost don't feel the track, comfortably pass over joints and

16.04.11: fitted to a VAZ-21093 (a month ago I fitted new shock absorbers, set up toe and camber) 4 tyres of this model, 175/70/R13, made in Korea in December 2010. Disappointed so far - the tyres are stiff, stiffer than the winter Kleber Kapnok 5, 2005 model, that were on before. Hope that this is not a characteristic of these tyres, but

Extremely quiet tire. At the same acoustic level as the Nokians, the speed increased by 40 km/h and I forgot what a skid on a wet road is. I have not seen a quieter tire yet - they significantly outperform Michelin and Nokian in terms of this parameter. Complaints about braking and handling are absent. Now, I probably will buy them for the new car.

Hello everyone. I used these tires for one season until the first frost. The tire is very good. On the highway, it provides significant fuel savings and brakes very well. I'm very satisfied with the tire. The only thing I can advise when buying is to check where it was made: if it's made in Korea, it's good, but if it's made in Turkey, don't buy it.

SUPER, but short-lived

I've already written about Michelin Energy, which seemed like a complete failure. KUMHO is the complete opposite. really the best tires, BUT. I put them on the car after a complete upgrade of the suspension with the installation of gas shock absorbers, spacers, and a reinforced stabilizer. Well, and new tires - Kumho. and it took off - on the rings less than a hundred, almost didn't drive, also braked sharply

A very worthy tire!

The tire is practically in no way inferior to the renowned manufacturers (GoodYear, Michelin, etc.) and costs several times cheaper. So there's no need to overpay. In my opinion, it's a very worthy competitor! I myself have already driven on it all summer, my size is large 215/50/17, my car is Mitsubishi Galant EAO. The tire is very comfortable on the highway and in the city, it practically DOES

Very good tires

My driving experience is not extensive (just over a year), but I'll still share my opinion about the Kumho Solus KH17 tires. They brake perfectly and are not affected by temperatures dropping to +5°C (I haven't driven in lower temperatures). They perform slightly worse in extremely hot weather. I dared to overtake a column of trucks on asphalt through puddles in heavy rain - the handling is excellent, with no aquaplaning. On dry UNE