Tyre reviews Kumho Solus KH17. Page 2 620

The tire was mounted on a factory-new vehicle. It's a good tire, providing good traction on both dry and wet roads. However, it has a low mileage lifespan. I've driven on this tire for three seasons, approximately 30,000 km, and it's likely to be worn out by the fourth season. I attribute the rapid wear to the vehicle's weight, as the same tire was used on my previous vehicle, a Hyundai Solaris, for the same distance, and it had

Quiet, braking to five, the squeal became audible on corners and braking, when it wore down to bare. The first two seasons, (May to October), the tread was good, the third wore down and needed to be changed, but I drove the fourth almost bald. Around 4000-4500 km run with trailer. Made in China. In the first two seasons I thought I'd definitely buy the same next one, but by the end of the second the tread was almost gone

Briefly: didn’t like it... Bought, having read about the quietness - nonsense... average quietness of the tire. But what really didn’t impress me was the first of all, the rolling resistance - i.e. the consumption on this tire increases (I immediately noticed, when I put it on - thought: it's just my imagination... replaced with the winter tire and drove on a half-dry road and the consumption on the winter Dänlop Graspis 2 is significantly

I've read the reviews and I'm fed up. I've never had such a poor UG before. I know people who are happy with this g..., but don't believe the positive reviews. All the tyres we sell are UG quality (only good on cars straight off the production line) and it doesn't matter if they're from Korea or China (here it's all rubbish). The tread is worn out after a few kilometres on the protector, the durability is a solid 2,

Hello! After long deliberations and reading reviews, including this site, I decided on Kumho Solus KH17, 185/65/15. Besides being smooth and quiet, I can say nothing more, as I haven't driven them even 200 km around Kiev in a very quiet mode, when, to my surprise, I discovered waves on the inner lateral part of three wheels on a lift. One wheel (rear) has these waves on both sides. A staff member at a nearby

Kumho Solus KH17 I'd say the tire performs well on a small mileage, especially on a wet road, swaying and slipping into a rut and water puddles, you think it will be swept away, but unfortunately, the car drives as if nailed. Prior to this, there was the Amtel (Korea), which performed two-star worse in aquaplaning.

Dear Alexey, I don't want to start an argument, but I hate open lies. I have the same AVEOshka with the same rubber. Let me repeat - the rubber is excellent! And your comment can be interpreted as: 1. An order from competitors; 2. Lack of driving skills, regardless of a 15-year experience; 3. Someone forced you to write a counterfeit or made-in China.

Good day!!

I've installed two of these tires on my front axle (195/60/R15) in place of completely worn out and cracked old ones.

Handling is great, no noise, holds the road well. Once at an emergency braking from about 70 km/h to 0 km/h (almost caught up with the car in front of me when it decided to pass a pedestrian without a pedestrian crossing) it stopped like it was embedded in the ground. So,

Ran a season on one, did 15,000 km. Tire was very satisfactory. Maybe not extremely quiet, but not extremely loud either. On dry/wet asphalt, got a five (steering and braking). Ride smoothness is fine. Fuel consumption is normal. Haven't tried her in the mud. Don't regret buying. Next time I'll buy the same.

Guys don't believe anyone - the rubber is top-notch, you can even say, oh-so-good, for very little money. I've driven on Barum Brilyance, Falken, Continental Contact 2 (I won't mention our Amtex, Kama, Rosava, and Belsby tyres). This is really the best, although it costs the same as the Barum. The Barum is wood, it floats on the sand, and it's as loud as a