Tyre reviews Amtel Planet. Page 1 96

Here is the translation:

I got these tires with the previous owner of the car. The tread condition was good, with around 4 mm of tread left, and no cracks. They lasted about 1.5 years with me, covering around 9-9.5 thousand kilometers. On a dry, flat road, they performed well, maintaining stable handling at 120-150 km/h. The only criticism is that they exhibited some uneven wear. The brakes were predictable, and the car stopped

Amtel Planet DC 185/65 R15 92H. Installed on Lada Largus van by the manufacturer. 3 seasons, mileage 105,000 km. Tire characteristics and durability exceeded expectations. Will replace with similar tires.

Size 205 65 15 were on a BMW 525, rear axle driven, used for about 25,000 km and performed satisfactorily in both rain and dry conditions. Noise tolerance was acceptable on this vehicle, but it started to vibrate at around 160 km/h and began to wobble at 180 km/h. I don't remember the speed ratings, but I believe it was up to 210 km/h. The suspension was okay, but this was due to the

I will never buy
I drove the tires from the car from the salon, drove for 2 months, small emerging bulges appeared on 2 wheels, and it doesn't brake on a wet road at all..
Pluses: well, dry road is nothing special
Minuses: on a wet road like on skis, weak sides

Tires for their money.

Since March, Amtel planet 3 on Toyota Caldina. As stated in the advertisement: "Low noise level. Variable entry into the contact patch of tread elements and step size provides a low noise level" I do not agree with this. Apparently, the perception of noise is different for everyone. The smoothness of the ride is acceptable. I haven't driven on wet surfaces yet. In the end, I'm not disappointed yet.

Hi, I was standing on an amtel 215/55/16 and I took it on the principle that any will be good in the summer, not winter. But it wasn't like that. The first pothole and the first crack, before that I didn't even think about how to ride so as not to get a crack. It turns out you need to choose just as carefully as a winter one (feel, squeeze - as they say, to try on the teeth). Not

Now it's my favorite tire.

Installed Planet FT-501 on Mazda 323 2.0. Very pleased with the tire. High-speed turns are not scary. Water drainage is perfect. The car handles perfectly. I advise all fans of active high-speed driving to try it. The tire handled sand and mud with dignity. Haven't tried it on snowy slush yet, since I installed it only in the spring.

Pros: A real tire for high-speed driving.

Poor

I was driving from Ternopil to Odessa on the NMH (approximately 120 km/h), it was raining, I didn't notice an oncoming car without dimmed lights while overtaking, I started braking to get back into my lane, the result was almost a disaster, I had to dodge first onto the opposite shoulder and then onto the grass. Only my driving experience helped. I don't recommend buying these, you won't save your life or health

Noticed the tire rupture in a timely manner

AMTEL PLANET 165/70/R13, VAZ 21093. I drove without any particular problems for 3 years (spring-autumn). My driving style is moderate. The car handles quite well on the road, but it's better on dry pavement than on wet. I'm satisfied after ROSAVA VS-11. Although the wear of AMTEL PLANET is noticeably stronger than ROSAVA. On cobblestone roads

Timely noticed a tire break

Drove for 3 years. Driving style is moderate. There were no particular complaints. On dry roads, it holds better than in the rain. On a rutted road in dry conditions when turning, it slightly skids. Compared to Rosava VS-11, it is softer and more comfortable. Handling is normal, but the steering wheel is vague and unclear. There is no sharpness in handling. For moderate and calm driving, it's excellent.