Tyre reviews WestLake ZuperEco Z-107. Page 3 33186

for balancing from 40 to 60g per wheel.
wear resistance is low.. in short, you get what you pay for. don't have illusions, gentlemen.

China. And a complete failure. Not only did they glue half a kilo to each wheel for balancing, but by 20,000 kilometers, the tire starts to lead, and octagons appear. At speeds above 130-140, the wheels start to beat. As for fuel efficiency - with a studded Continental winter tire, fuel consumption is 20% less, although it should be more.
Regarding the cost - the price of such new tires should not be more than 2000₽ per wheel.
Wear resistance - 20,000 - almost complete wear of the tread.
Chinese one-time quality that does not ensure safety.
Any half-worn used Japanese or European tire will be 100 times better.
And most importantly - it doesn't hold on a wet road! At all!
Before you buy - think about safety!

I have a fast car and I drive actively. The tires are excellent for city driving.
On a wet road, they slip and float, just like all the others. However, the skidding is soft and can be controlled. On a dry road, both acceleration and braking are excellent.
In some cases, even in the city, they slip to the limit on a dry road.
Therefore, they are not suitable for sports driving, but in the city, they have a large margin for any driver and will be satisfactory.

I was looking for a budget-friendly option with a good price-to-quality ratio, and after visiting several salons, one of them recommended this tire. It wasn't in stock, so they told me to wait a week, but it arrived in just 4 days. In the meantime, I was studying reviews on the internet and found that opinions were divided 50/50. I decided to buy it, and the fact that the store offered free mounting and balancing, which other stores didn't, was a decisive factor. The tire turned out to be quite good, moderately soft, not noisy, and it handles dry roads well, keeping the car stable. I also drove in the rain, reaching speeds of up to 100 km/h, and when I had to swerve to avoid a pedestrian who appeared on the road without turning on their lights, I had to brake sharply to get back into my lane. The tire didn't let me down, it didn't lose traction, and the car stayed stable. I have a long trip of over 6,000 km ahead of me, so we'll see how it performs.

Excellent tires in their price category. They behave well on both wet roads and with the presence of sand, are less prone to aquaplaning, and hold corners excellently. After a mileage of five thousand, wear is practically not noticeable compared to Nokian. Balanced perfectly, the largest load being 10 grams.

Yesterday I specially went to Severodvinsk and put on four balloons. I also looked at the weight of the balloon and the price. I took the bottom of the market, I was lucky with the weight, they are also the lightest. I talked to the workers, they say that there are minor complaints about one brand from China, but the return under warranty is easy and clear. I'm generally satisfied with everything. Since I went to the native size, the weight of the wheel decreased by 6 kg, which is a lot, and the car drove great in all senses. Asphalt tires are great. If I don't forget, I'll write an addendum in October when I switch to winter tires.

Quiet, grippy, summer, puddles are okay.

Tire bomb, stood Nankook Korea, this is much better

The tire is too expensive as it wears out in 20,000 km, i.e. 1 summer season, didn't justify the money spent initially, the tread is 3 mm smaller than normal European ones, I didn't like it, normal tire should last 50-60 thousand km. For comparison, Toyo Proxes - 60 thousand km, Bridgestone Turanza - 70 thousand km, Hankook - 60 thousand km, Michelin Primacy 4 - 50 thousand km, Kama Euro winter studded tire, purchased in 2011, passed 4 seasons - 60 thousand km (yes, it's not a soft Japanese or Finnish studded tire, but over the entire mileage, almost all the studs remained, when I bought it, they told me that the factory had soldered these studs so that they wouldn't fall out without running-in). There is something to compare with.

Decent manufacturing look and a large number of positive reviews, but I was unlucky, as colleagues predicted. This tire wobbles when moving, it's uneven.

I purchased these tires in the summer, drove to the sea on them, and also drove around 3.5 thousand km, which is approximately 6,000 km in total.
The first thing that I really like is how quiet they are, it's really very quiet.
The rubber is very soft - this is both an advantage and a disadvantage, it's up to each individual. In cool weather, it doesn't become hard, but the sidewall is very soft and can be torn on the edge of a curb.
On wet roads, it behaves adequately, handles, starts, and brakes properly, and the fuel consumption on the car is also good.
It's too early to talk about wear, as I haven't driven much.
The balancing is excellent, I read reviews that some people had issues with balancing - maybe I just got lucky and there are no vibrations.
I haven't driven over 180 km/h on these tires and I wouldn't advise anyone to do so, in case the car starts to pull or becomes uneven, and it's also not safe.
My car is a Skoda Octavia a7, the tire size is 225/45/17, and the tire pressure is 2.4.