Tyre reviews Pirelli Winter Sottozero II. Page 1 52
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Winter tire on the Euroxia! It snows? We stand still and don't move! Black ice? We don't go anywhere either! In short, even in the Moscow region this tire has shown itself to be awful! There's a feeling it's altogether a summer tyre... (sarcasm) I compare it to a Michelin sticker - it gripped the road!
- Vehicle:
- Citroen C4 SpaceTourer
- Size:
- 205/55 R17 91H
- Buy again?:
- Absolutely not
- City:
- Podolsk
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Excellent tires, there was a feeling that the studs gripped and pulled so clearly. Very pleased with the purchase and operating experience
- Vehicle:
- BMW 3 (E90, E91, E92, E93)
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Before purchasing these tires, I drove a Toyota Corolla with Bridgestone Blizak. I used Pirelli on my Mazda CX-5 with a manual transmission. I'd like to say that Pirelli perform significantly worse on snow and ice compared to Bridgestone. When there's a small layer of black ice on the road, you need to be cautious, especially when turning. You need to ease off the gas, and the car will swing to one side. I'm stating
- Vehicle:
- Mazda CX-5
- Size:
- 225/65 R17 102H
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Reliability and comfort are perhaps the main characteristics of these tires. There are, of course, nuances that simply need to be taken into account. For example, they will undoubtedly ride better on asphalt or dry snow than on wet roads or a snowy mess. But that's just obvious. Overall, the tires are very good, completely in line with their price.
- Vehicle:
- Mercedes GLA-Class
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Thought that winter tires were softness and poor directional stability, but zero to hero ruined this stereotype. On wet asphalt at high speed holds the line perfectly, doesn't hydroplane up to 120 km/h, haven't tried any higher because laws of physics can't be cheated. On a snowy mash drive confidently, don't slip. For the city, perfect wheels.
- Vehicle:
- Mazda MX-5
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Good tire, only thing I didn't like is that it's a 2013 model, I would have preferred something more recent.
- Vehicle:
- Audi A6 2,5TD 1997-2004
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
- Rate
- Rate
- Rate