Tyre reviews Kumho Ecsta SPT KU31. Page 5 2129
- Rate
Installed on Toyota Camry V40 3.5 V6 on 225/50R17. Bought for 4500 rubles per tire. Super tires. Keep the road on dry asphalt super. My friend has Michelin Primacy HP on his Camry 3.5, by feeling (his and mine) Michelin is weaker than Kumho. Price/quality ratio - 5 out of 5.
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Camry 3,5L 2006-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Best for any patch. Blows competition out of water. I have also clipped them on a couple of deep and edge worn tyres and they still come out unscathed and look great, handle well and exceed expectations. Highly recommend!
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi VR- 4
- Size:
- 215/45 R17 ZR
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
I bought these tires yesterday. They were balanced very poorly, with each wheel needing to be rotated four times on the machine to reach zero. This was frustrating. I drove them... they're soft, and unevenness is well smoothed out. I didn't put them through extreme testing. In terms of noise, they're about average. It's hard to remember how my old summer tires sounded, but the Bridgestone ER300 seemed to be louder, and my latest winter Bridgestone Revo
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Camry 2,4L 2006-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
It was on the last car on RIAL discs in size 195x65xR15.
I'm happy with the rubber - I drove 2 seasons and sold the car. In the city, I think there's no point in describing the behavior - the brands don't differ much from each other.
On the highway, it handles straight lines at speeds above 130-140 (dry asphalt) perfectly, the car doesn't twitch. In my opinion, it's not- Vehicle:
- Audi 80(B4) 2,0L 1992-1994
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I chose these tires as a replacement for the OE Hankooks which were terrible in wet/dry/snow and tire wear. Got a very good deal on tyreshopper it's better but not brilliant in snow and pretty noisy but worn very well
- Size:
- 215/45 R17 V
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
These tires are not bad, but I was disappointed that they were not even better, especially after reading other reviews. Performance is nothing outstanding in wet or dry. I will be buying something else next time, although as a budget tire they are okay.
- Vehicle:
- Alfa Romeo 156 2.0 litre TS
- Size:
- 205/55 R16 V
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
I bought these tires because they had good reviews. In reality, though, I'm quite disappointed with them. They're pretty average on wet and dry grip, and are also pretty noisy. They're a fair price, but there are so many better tires.
- Vehicle:
- Alfa Romeo 156 2.5 V6 24V SP3
- Size:
- 205/55 R16 ZR
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
Pt tire driver top tires, for frequent travelers is wear too high. Legendary ride comfort, despite low section, the quietest tire I've had on this car. Nssegrip nothing comes out OK for wet heater. In relation to the price really good tire.
- Vehicle:
- Mercedes 190E 2, 6
- Size:
- 215/40 R17
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
Very impressed with these - I've had Yoko and Falken on this car before and Kumho beat these hands down. Wear they were really impressed was the level of grip and feedback on the wet road - I know exactly when they will let go and what I can push them too! They get noisy as they wear, but that was to be expected if you look at the tread pattern. Impressed with tire longevity too!
- Vehicle:
- Renault Clio 182
- Size:
- 205/45 R17 H
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
Overall, these are very good tires in both wet and dry conditions. They wear better than the Conti EcoContact CP, but fuel economy is down by about 5%. The fronts have worn down to only about 3 mm in 11,500 miles, so from one turn, I should get just over 40,000 miles out of a set, and that's good. Don't think you can go too far wrong with these tires
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi Spacestar DiD
- Size:
- 195/55 R15 V
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability