Tyre reviews Kleber Dynaxer HP2. Страница 1 214

I've been driving on the Kleber Dynaxer NR2 60000 tire for a while now, and I have to say that it's been a great experience. The tire is worth every penny I've spent on it. Whether it's on wet or dry roads, I've never had any issues with stopping, and the tire has performed flawlessly. In the rain, the handling is superb.

One of the downsides is that when it's extremely hot outside (during the summer

performs well on wet pavement

I don't know how my fellow below says Barum is better than Kleber??? I'll say right away that I have quite a bit of driving experience and something to compare it to! I previously drove on Matador, Fulda, Continental, Pirelli, and Michelin! I want to say the following: this tire has excellent grip on both dry and wet pavement, even at speeds over 120 km/h, max speed on the Kiev-O

I got it with the purchase of the car. At first, I thought it was some kind of scam, but the truth is that the tire is very good for its price. So I drove on it for three years, although I was initially planning to replace it right away. It handles well both in the rain and in the heat!

Got as a purchase. Ridden approximately 15,000 km. Don't know how much before that. Compared to nothing in particular. After a short ride on a deflated tire, three blisters appeared. By the noise, probably average. Brake characteristics good. Handling in wet snow (with wear around 30-40%) not very. Won't climb a slope of 15 degrees covered in wet snow. Performs well on a road with a small amount of ice (which even surprised).

Just dressed
I drive fast, a bit noisy, but within the norm. Size 205/65 R15 Profile, of course, is a bit high, but nevertheless, it steers clearly.
Pros: Super on water. On dry pavement, it's also not bad, especially acceleration. Smoothness is at a good level.
Cons: Braking on wet asphalt

Not for Ukraine

Everything is not bad, but not for our roads, not the worst pothole and already the tire is damaged and this is at a slow speed. On other tires of Polish, by the way, not French production, with much more severe impacts, this was not observed. In general, the sidewall is not suitable:(

After Barguzin, just a fairy tale, excellent choice of price/quality

Never thought that there is a difference between our Kama or Barguzin and good tires. It turns out there is and a very big one, it doesn't make noise, it's soft, grippy in any weather. In general, there are more pluses than minuses, the minus is that the tires are less adapted to our roads, and bulges and punctures are guaranteed with careless driving

excellent tires for their money

Having run for one season about 15,000 km, the tires showed themselves only from the best side: not a single puncture (although I drove about 3000 km on a completely off-road track - the highway from St. Petersburg to Pskov, Novgorod to Pskov, and in Ukraine in the Dnepropetrovsk region). For the season - one self-tapping screw. They hold the road perfectly in

Great highway tires
For the season, one complaint - bumps come out (even with careful driving). Rain - excellent. Mud and grass - bad, can seriously slip. On the highway, low noise. In general - for such money - quite good. For those who drive more on the highway - an excellent choice. And for mixed mode - worth thinking about
Pros: Driving on wet roads
Cons: Driving on mud, weak on potholes

Slabenko

The road holds not bad, on a dirt road it goes softer than Nokian NRH i, wore out quickly, at a height of 2.5 mm it behaves uncertainly on a wet surface. In general, it's better than domestic ones, but it loses to imports in terms of handling, if it could last at least 40,000 km, then maybe I would take it, but I don't want to. For comparison, I have Bar