Tyre reviews Fulda Kristall Montero. Страница 3 365

It's a great tire, but there's one drawback that ruins everything - it's soooo loud that sometimes this noise resonates on the car body. It's very loud when overcoming small road irregularities. This spoils the overall impression of the tire. Mine is made in France.
Pros: pulls out of snow perfectly
Cons: very noisy

Not bad at all.
Astra N 1.6 car, saw a lot over the winter, the tires definitely don't like ice, but in snow (both rolled and loose) they behave decently, a bit noisy at speeds over 120, but if you drive 80-90% in the city, this is what you need, price, quality - everything is on the level.
Pros: decent on any surface except pure ice.
Cons: noisy

Good tire

quite an unkillable tire, drove 1 season, very pleased. Holds the car very well when aquaplaning, also confidently holds the road in snow, doesn't like sharp braking on ice. Moderately quiet. As for wear - I'll drive another season.

The money invested in it has paid off, I'm very pleased

For a new car, the first winter. Barely made it on "DEBICA" on black ice to the warehouse, recommended without studs, as for the city. I felt around the entire thing without asking the price, I liked it - I wanted it. Took it for $43 in 2004. Was driving back with caution, got used to it from the first minutes. Snowy slush 10

On a dry road, it's slightly worse than an all-season tire,

on ice, it's so-so, understandably, it's not studded, but if you drive carefully, you can drive on ice! I haven't tried it on snow yet, I only bought it this year!! The tire is not very noisy - it's tolerable, it rides softer, good stability on turns, better than an all-season tire! In terms of quality, it's not inferior to Good

One of the best in the price-quality category

I drove through the winter, the tires are OK. Only when braking sharply (for some reason, only the front wheels lock up, which is characteristic of domestic cars) on a wet road, the impression is not much better than on BC 11.

worth taking
can compare with BC-10 - quieter, softer, the car goes straight, doesn't drift to the sides, BUT still on the dacha through snowdrifts it pulls worse than BC-10
Pros: quiet, soft, the car goes straight
Cons: uphill on deep snow on the new BC-10 still better

I think the tire is normal
the price-quality ratio is good, I'll ride out the winter and write a full review of the tire, for now there's nothing special to say
Pros: holds the road well, soft and quiet
Cons: don't know yet

Not bad tire for the city
In short: on snow it pulled well, on ice it didn't slip, got on the ice under the wheels and skidded... snow, otherwise helpless. Howls on dry asphalt. I'm happy. The tires are a quarter of a year old, I'll drive through the winter and get them in the summer.
Pros: excellent on snow, asphalt, and slush.
Cons: on ice like on a

In short, cheap winter tires
The price is like Rosava, in frosty winter, even Nokian is predictable, though not super, in snowy frost it's excellent, and in wet slush it's nothing, but everything else is weak. In general, a good, cheap tire for the off-season when the temperature is +3 to 0 degrees.
Pros: cheap and cheerful
Cons: ice, wet snow