Tyre reviews Barum Brillantis. Страница 3 273
- Rate
Above average, I advise you to take
I've driven 50,000 km. Noisy. I used to drive on Pirelli, Michelin, Goodyear. You're comparing tires like a mid-range car to a luxury class. For its price range, the tires are quite good. At 140 km/h, I hit a deep pothole on the highway and as a result, two front tires can't be repaired, but I think the Titans are to blame
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Tires are not perfect, but you can drive on them, and quite well!!
I've driven over 30,000 km and it will probably go for another 30,000...I don't know how you can turn it into a bald knee at 30,000...it goes well on dry asphalt, only when making sharp turns it leans, well, that's understandable with a profile of 80...it's bad on wet surfaces, almost immediately worn out...
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
normal, not expensive
For summer it will do just fine. Normal tire, doesn't vibrate, wear is even, not too loud, not rigid. Although, of course, not a luxury class. But for that money, it doesn't pretend to be. And only for summer.
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Noisy and not for wet roads.
I drove for three seasons. In total, 50 thousand. Honestly, I didn't like it. Noisy (in terms of noise like Nokian with spikes). On a wet road, I almost crashed the car twice. The wheels lock up, and even at low speed, it can skid when turning (that's what I'm talking about on a wet road). In November, with the first snow (about 5 mm),
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Rate
- Wearability
- Rate
It came to me as an inheritance in a pretty worn-out state. I somehow managed to get through the season and discarded it. I installed it right after the Fulda. It's like I installed an airplane turbine on the car! The ride is also on the edge. The asphalt can still take it, but driving on sand is a whole different story. It absolutely can't handle snow! I went out on a small wet snowfall of about 2-3cm, made it to the
- Vehicle:
- Chevrolet Aveo 1,6L 2004-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
not better than Rosava
very noisy, at speeds after 100 km/h super noisy, plus floats on the asphalt, if it weren't for being in the base with a new car, I would have taken the Korean NEXEN for the same price
Pros: behaves not bad for cheap tires
Cons: noisy- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Normal tire
installed after the standard all-season - so far only delights.
Pluses: price, well holds the road dry and wet road at least up to 120km/h, brakes well
Minuses: noisy but not on every surface- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Class is a tire's speed rating, which indicates its maximum safe operating speed.
- Vehicle:
- Renault Logan
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I have used it on dirt, sand and asphalt, 50,000 km and no cracks or punctures, worn down to the core, buying the same model, Renault Logan 2009.
- Vehicle:
- Renault Laguna 1,6L 1998-2000
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Not impressed. Holds the road well, doesn't understeer, in the rain nothing, but it turned out to be very weak on our roads - prone to lateral bumps and cuts.
- Vehicle:
- Ford Sierra 2,0L 1987-1992
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability