Tyre reviews Barum Brillantis. Страница 2 273

Excellent
This is the best tire model from Barum. It combines all the good qualities. Can easily compete with many Michelin counterparts. Those who say this model is bad are just low-level trolls.
Pros: price-quality

Not good and not bad. On my own

Now it's not even winter (November '07), but there's snow on the roads, a bit of black ice, etc. I overdid it with "winter" tires (not for advertising - Marangoni) and immediately felt a noticeable difference from Vredestein summer tires (which came with the Fabia from the salon). It turns out that there was noise and harshness on the Barum, and when maneuvering

If you don't consider the price, the tires are terrible

I have them as standard on my Dacia Logan. Before that, I drove a VAZ 2106 on Rosava VS-20, and on wet asphalt and in mud, they behave almost the same, it's like driving on glass.

I liked it:)
it was a standard on VAZ2111, soft rubber, normal wear, drove 50 thousand, puddles passed at 120, no complaints, drove all year round, in winter they hold better than Nokian NRE all-season tires, if I had found, I would have bought the same one as a replacement, unfortunately, there was none:(
Pros: good road holding, long-lasting
Cons: a bit noisy

I liked it, I recommend
I drove four seasons in total, about 70,000 km. At first, it wore out quickly (apparently it was running in), then very slowly. There were no damages, it was balanced quite well
Pros: Soft, quiet, wear-resistant
Cons: didn't find any particular ones

Average tire.
It fully justifies its price. Average good tire. The off-road size 165x80 has its own advantages on off-road (together with the suspension, they create an unparalleled pair)) and its disadvantages on the highway (narrow and high) - nevertheless, it confidently holds 140 on the highway.
Pros: Decent wear resistance
Cons: Mud is not its element, rollover on turns

Durable, noisy, doesn't hold on mud
went 20,000 on Dacia Logan, 1 hole, calm style, drove on all kinds of "dumps". Noisy after 100. Really doesn't like mud. (First snow on a dusty road, simply uncontrollable)
Pros: Durable
Cons: noisy, doesn't hold on mud

Terrible tire.

On Logan, the standard tire. One plus - the combination of radius-width 165*80/14", i.e. on dirt roads and "police speed bumps" without damage to disks and body can be driven... Tire - complete trash!!!! Noisy beyond measure, worn out in 30,000 to the state of "knee"! In the rain on asphalt, what ice. Slightly pressed the brake - already skidded. In general,

Price-quality ratio
I tested these tires everywhere, even in winter I didn't remove one pair from the rear, surprisingly it didn't become stiff and in winter, the rubber is soft. In general, worthy tires, my friends =)
Pros: quiet, soft
Cons: didn't notice

Terrible
It's not a tire, noise like a tank, handling is non-existent, wear - 30,000 km bald as a billiard ball. I'll never buy it and wouldn't take it for free.
Pros: none!
Cons: noise, high wear.