Tyre reviews Barum Brillantis 273

  • Barum Brillantis
    Barum Brillantis

Статистика отзывов на шины Barum Brillantis

Ниже отображены сводные характеристики шины, основанные на отзывах и оценках автовладельцев со всего мира.
При учёте общей оценки летней шины её показатели на снегу и льду не учитываются.

  • Средняя оценка шин Barum Brillantis пользователями сайта: 3.61 из 5
  • Количество отзывов на шины Barum Brillantis: 273 шт.
  • Место в рейтинге: 1418
  • Место в рейтинге (летние): 708
Control on a dry road
Braking on dry roads
Steering in the wet
Braking on wet roads
Control on dirt
Drive comfort
Internal noise
Quiet in motion
Rate
Resistant to aquaplaning
Velocity characteristics
Wearability
Quality of production
Price/performance
Все оценки пользователей
Оценки реальных покупателей

Оценки шин Barum Brillantis по месяцам

По распределению
оценок

1
8%
2
14%
3
11%
4
50%
5
18%
  • about tyre Barum Brillantis

    Rate
    4.2

    I've driven them empty and full, on the road and off. No issues whatsoever. Now they're 8.5 years old, with 4mm of tread remaining. Time for a change by age alone. I'm after the originals - 165/80, or 185/70, but specifically Barum. I trust them. And for such a price (even at higher prices) you wouldn't want better!

    Vehicle:
    Renault Logan
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Barum Brillantis

    Rate
    3.4

    After 2 seasons of use, cracks appeared at the edge of the tread. The tire mileage is 6000 km (I drive little, mostly in the city). Handling after Goodyear winter tires is completely non-existent, the car reacts slowly to steering wheel turns, it's harder to steer (I have to apply more force). But, of course, there's a plus: many times I had to swerve to avoid mad taxi drivers onto the sidewalk - no cuts or punctures.

    Vehicle:
    Dacia Logan  1,6L  2005-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Barum Brillantis

    Super

    I've read and realized... I have Nokia 265/45, BMW 740 - 38th body. "10th", just bought... Had KAMA, installed Michelin - hard and disgusting. Threw Barum - the car brakes perfectly, holds the road - super... And on the topic of noise - the Nokian is so noisy that you can't even imagine. Rating:  20-08-2007  review sent by Yale

  • about tyre Barum Brillantis

    average or below this

    It comes standard on the Skoda Fabia from the dealership. I'm going to change it, it's not suitable for the highway, it understeers a bit when cornering at 120 km/h, it's not much, but it's nerve-wracking, I'm looking for another one to replace it, I had Amtel on my previous car and it held the road better, although the Skoda has better handling in general

  • about tyre Barum Brillantis

    Rate
    4.1

    Fits the vehicle class. Ran 49,000 km (mainly city), 5 seasons. In total: 1 sidewall cut, tread didn't reach the bulge, by the 5th season there was a crack effect (age). A bit noisy (especially coarse asphalt). Cuts straight water above average. In corners - below average.

    Vehicle:
    Dacia Logan  1,4L  2005-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Barum Brillantis

    Rate
    4.5

    Wore well up to 99,000 km and was sold with the car, along with a "zero" spare tire. It's interesting how you can kill the tires in 30,000 km with a "moderate" driving style? :-) That's not even a style. :-) Normal tires for budget money. No planning up to 120 km/h when there's a 3 cm layer of water on asphalt, from Borisoglebsk to Saratov (heavy rain). On

    Vehicle:
    VAZ Kalina (2119-2118)  1.5L  2006-2009
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Barum Brillantis

    Rate
    4.5

    I've been driving for three years, quite enough. The wear and tear is pleasing - minimal tread wear. It's soft. The grip is not very good - frequent wheel spin when accelerating hard, can get stuck in mud - lacks traction. It's noisy at speeds over 100km. For city driving without extreme conditions - ideal, especially considering the price.

    I'll be getting the same ones for summer, since I've changed to larger rims.

    For city

    Vehicle:
    Volkswagen Golf 2  1,6L  1983-1990
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Barum Brillantis

    normal price-quality ratio
    drove for two years, about 35,000 thousand. Production - Romania. It's hard to say that it's soft......But it's quiet enough - that's a plus. Behaves well in the rain. At high speeds, there are no particular complaints, although there were no extreme situations....In short, the tire is reliable....
    Pros: price, low noise
    Cons: fairly stiff 11-03-2007

  • about tyre Barum Brillantis

    Summer tires Barum Brillantis

    Tires were used on VAZ-09. I liked it... especially when I drove into a tunnel at speed, with 10 cm of water and the car didn't even skid! The waves were above the roof...)) I drove for 2 seasons... no problems.

  • about tyre Barum Brillantis

    blew

    It has been 3000 km and it blew up on a flat asphalt road at a speed of 20 km/h. Only one blew up on the right front wheel, and there is actually no tread wear. I fully agree with the noise.

    Pros: Wear-resistant

    Cons: reliability, noise 11-07-2007