Best traction performance on any surface highest speed on treadwear on any surface high level of comfort
Minor remarks on handling and stability in extreme modes
Points: 928
They are not cheap, but they took first place! Short braking distance - one meter less than the nearest competitor when slowing down on wet asphalt at a speed of 80 km/h and three meters less when braking on dry pavement at a speed of 100 km/h.
High grip properties on any surface High speed capability on any surface Excellent handling Easily controllable in extreme driving situations on any surface Quiet
Minor comments regarding ride smoothness
Points: 927
This model is more designed for extreme driving modes compared to the leader.
Good handling and cornering performance on dry surfaces low fuel consumption at 90 km/h Good directional stability
Hard
Points: 889
The data of the Japanese brand’s tires is always priced 15% lower than their main competitor, Bridgestone, despite sometimes having significantly better characteristics, as seen in this test. Additionally, these tires demonstrated the lowest fuel consumption at a speed of 80 km/h
This tire cannot be attributed to the racing formula, it's not energetic: it's not suitable for extreme maneuvering. To keep the car in turns, the driver will require extraordinary skill. Although on a straight line, the tires hold the car quite well even at high speed.
Satisfactory course stability and tractability in extreme modes on any surface
low speed execution of rearrangement on dry pavement increased fuel consumption
Score: 867
In terms of characteristics, the tire is similar to the model of the second line of the Italian brand, but it loses to it in terms of steering clarity and comfort.
Leading economics at any speed soft satisfying level of noise.
low traction properties and speed when rearranged unclear course complicated handling in extreme modes on wet coverage problematic - on dry
Points: 841
You'll have to force yourself to drive slowly and keep a safe distance on these tires, as the Stella has quite modest braking properties (although it's 1-3 meters better than Bridgestone). And you should avoid sharp lane changes, working the steering wheel smoothly and gently in any situation. As a compensation - fuel savings at any speed.
High speed on dry handling Economical at 90 km/h Satisfactory cornering stability and noise levels.
the lowest traction properties on any surface
difficult handling in extreme modes on any surface
stiff
Points: 835
The braking difference with the leader is almost 4 meters on wet asphalt and five on dry. The only bonus is fuel savings in suburban mode. Perhaps the reason lies in the place of production - Thailand? Tires with the "Made in Japan" stamp have always performed better.
