Tyre reviews Windforce Catchfors UHP. Page 88 2247

Worthy tires for their price, I recommend

Surprisingly excellent tires for the money. I don't know if there's an alternative in terms of "price/quality". I thought everything would be much worse. The noise level is even lower than that of a similar Michelin with polyurethane inserts. In other respects, time will tell. So far, after a month of operation, there are no complaints, again, in comparison with Michelin, which is installed from the factory. I will observe and possibly buy them again in the future.

Good day to everyone!
After reading many reviews about these tires, I'm quite surprised by the fairy-tale-like stories about the extreme imbalance of the tires. Of course, there's no doubt that defective batches of products can occur, but for it to be so severe that only one tire fitter could handle them and remove the vibration, etc.? It sounds like a fairy tale.
Okay, fine.
I have two cars, a Nissan Teana (215/55/17 ZR) and a Lada 2107 (175/70/13 HP).
Both cars are equipped with this tire set, with two seasons on the Lada and one on the Teana.
I completely agree with all the positive reviews.
This is the ideal budget option, with a perfect balance of price and quality.
The tires are moderately soft and moderately hard, not noisy (I've taken a few long trips and my ears didn't get tired).
Small potholes are simply absorbed, and medium-sized ones can be felt, but it depends on how you drive over them.
The driving mode ranges from pensioner-like to racing, and in all conditions, the tires perform well. They may not be able to compete with any particular premium brand, but they will hold their own confidently.
I've also convinced a couple of friends to get the same tires, and they've never regretted it.
Would I buy them again? Yes, I would.
P.S. The low ratings for snow and ice are because I'm writing about SUMMER tires.

Normal tires, moderately noisy, reinforced sidewall.

Not for the first time I'm buying this tire and not for the first car I'm putting it on, for its price it's very good tire, I advise everyone

Excellent budget tires

Good

Good tire at an affordable price!

The application was executed formally, the tires create vibration, it's impossible to drive a premium car, I returned it for inspection, they replied that everything is fine, they did a stupid balancing and sent a photo. In fact, there was no expertise at all. They think I'm a fool. I replied, put the tires on the car and drive, there was no answer. Without a fool, life is bad, that's their slogan. Probably, the law on consumer protection is parallel to them. The prosecutor's office is my helper. I have no complaints about Mosavtoshina itself, but about the idiots who work with clients...

It's time to leave a review of this tire. I've driven 20,000 km on it. The size is 185/55 R16.

My car is a Honda Fit 2 RS with front-wheel drive. The load was around 30 kg per wheel. They balanced normally. The tire is quiet, soft, and grippy. It handles well on both dry and wet asphalt. It absorbs bumps normally. My car has a sport suspension, which makes it quite stiff, but the tires partially compensate for this. The tire is somewhat prone to understeer. To get a better feel for the steering, you need to drive at least 2.3 bar. Perhaps this understeer would be less noticeable if my rims were wider. And there is a minus. The front axle has significant wear after 20,000 km, with a remaining tread depth of around 4 mm. I'm comparing this to the same Hankook Ventus Prime3, on which I've driven 60,000 km. My car never loses traction, although I drive quite actively. Now I'm planning to swap the front and rear tires and drive another 10,000 km, hopefully. The tires, overall, were a pleasure to use. Will I buy them again? Very likely. Solid 4. Ice and snow, of course, are a different story.