Tyre reviews Windforce Catchfors UHP. Page 75 2247

Wears well, doesn't chip off in pieces

Creditable tires for this price category.

In my perception, they are comparable to Michelin.

I bought these tires for my wife's Tiguan to replace the old ones that had become hard with time. We needed tires suitable for city roads. I didn't expect such performance from a budget Chinese tire. It's quiet, soft, handles well on asphalt, and reacts predictably to ruts. At civilian speeds up to 180 km/h, it's not scary. The tread is purely highway-oriented, and it's not worth leaving the asphalt on it. It starts to skid even on wet grass, although it holds well on wet asphalt. Well, and it's clear that it's only for summer use.

Good tires. The price, quality matches the description.

Great value for the money

Good tire, excellent price-quality ratio. On the 7 series BMW with 19-inch radius, no problems have been noticed, it handles great, there is no noise, and after 20,000 km, there is no wear. On the Skoda Octavia A7, the same ones are installed only in 18-inch radius, and for 2 seasons already, there have been no complaints about the tire. The only thing this tire lacks is a rim protector. In all other respects, it's great.

People, don't take this crap, I bought a car with them, with absolutely new tires, thought the tires were good

In the end, I was happy for a short time, this set of tires was enough for 10-12 thousand km with calm driving, I've never encountered tires that wear out so quickly,

When it came to removing these tires from the disk, 3 tire fitters together tried to dismantle this hard tire for 10 minutes, and in the end, they couldn't do it, I tried it at 2 different tire fitting shops, and in the end, I had to cut the tire with a grinder,

I don't understand why this tire has such good reviews, most likely they are fake, since this is a Mosavtoshina brand and they are promoting their product, because I don't know how you can write that this tire is "Soft" and "quiet". People, understand that there is no such thing as a free lunch, only in a mousetrap

I myself work in the tire industry, I've seen a lot of tires, but I've never seen such crap before. Size 225/45 R17

The initial impressions were good, it holds the track better than Yokogama. After 5 thousand kilometers of highway driving, vibration appeared, I went to the tire shop, they said that one tire is becoming crooked, weak cord inside and it starts to lead. After a new balancing, I drove further, and as a result, I drove a couple more thousand kilometers and the vibration appeared again. I returned to the tire shop, they removed the wheels and now 3 out of 4 are in poor condition, the master spent about 2 hours trying to catch the balance somehow. In the end, I can say that for those who drive in the city 80% of the time, it's probably okay, but for those who drive a lot on the highway, I strongly do not recommend it. The vibration will not go away.

I bought 2 Windforce Catchfors UHP 215/55 ZR16 97W XL tires and installed them on the front. They were balanced at 3045 and 2050. After 20,000 km, the steering wheel started to vibrate at speeds of 85 and above. I checked the balance and it was normal, so I replaced the weights with ones that were +/- 10 grams, and was advised to check the drives. I replaced 2 tripods (15,000 rubles with labor), but the result was almost 0, the vibration became slightly less. Then I bought 2 Sailun Atrezzo Elite 215/55 R16 97W XL tires, which were balanced at 100 and 1025, and installed them on the front. And miracle, the vibrations disappeared. Conclusion: these tires led me to unnecessary repairs, I'm lucky I didn't throw away the original tripods, who knows how long the non-original ones would last. Why didn't I change the front and rear tires before the repair? The rear had tires that I was planning to "make do until winter" and then replace. The total mileage of the car is 275,000 km.