Tyre reviews Tigar Hitris 111

My selection criteria for tyres are: noise level, suspension comfort, handling, aquaplaning resistance, off-road grip, fuel economy, mileage, and price. Now about my impressions. Before I had Hiflex Dynaxer HP2. Therefore, it is quite a comparison with them and simple impressions. On any asphalt, there is no noise at any speed. It handles asphalt "pancakes" and bridge joints well at speed. It holds the road very tightly, does not wander,

Size: 215/55 R16. Quiet, only a hum on rough asphalt. Performs well on wet roads, including low-speed. More than 40,000 km on one set. Bought to replace two on the front – the external part of the tire worn out (heavy car), the rear axle is like new. Best value for money. Made in Serbia.

Do you think the worst tire is a Chinese one? You're wrong! I've had worse than these. What would you say if you had 80-90kg added to each wheel in the service station and your car was still shaking like it had oval wheels, even on brand new aluminum rims?

Following the mechanic's recommendation, I replaced the 195/50R15 with a 195/55R15 to avoid straining the suspension and to prevent the car from shaking on the road. In short, I did not deceive the mechanic. As for the difference with the 185/65R14, there was no difference in terms of comfort during driving. The rubber is very soft. The difference is that it is slightly heavier to turn due to the wider profile. On the downside,

Reading a lot of reviews online, I decided to buy the 205/55 R16 model tires and that was my mistake, I wasted my money. I would like to warn other drivers.

The tire is relatively quiet and holds the road well, it is predictable on both dry and wet surfaces.

However, for about 2000 km of city driving on these tires, a small crack appeared, despite normal pressure and no deep potholes encountered, while my second car with Dunlop tires had

The tyre is really good! I bought another one in March 205/65/R15... so I've been driving on it for half a year now and I really like it. I've driven in different weather conditions, in the rain... the quality is excellent, it grips the road well, even at speeds of 130km/h... Those who are from Tomsk will understand what kind of roads we have here. The noise level is low, I didn't expect it (plus a huge

Who is saying it's noisy? In 3 full seasons, I've never heard a sound! What are you lying about? Is it even possible to call it noisy? When you're driving at 200 km/h and sticking your head out of the window, is there any noise in your ears? :) Number of seasons doesn't matter, but the fourth one had a poor start and failed, and I'd have taken off the final season if it weren't for... Right now I'm looking

These tyres would be great for most cars and a good quality. However, they are not suitable for any form of performance car driving due to the lack of feel they give and poor wet weather grip. They are not hazardous, as their behaviour is predictable, but they are nowhere near as good, as they are not much cheaper than the Barum Bravuris 2.

Great value for money tire.
I initially wanted to get the Nokian Hakka Green but they were out of stock for my tire size (185/65R14). I ended up buying this one based on a shop assistant’s recommendation.
On wet roads (it was pouring!) it performed flawlessly - the only limiting factor was visibility, while handling and braking were "perfect"
The only downside, IMHO, is that it generates a bit of noise. Plus

Minus: extremely noisy, no matter how much I tried to get used to it. I have to admit, I was expecting something better. The standard Kumho was no quieter (Chevrolet Rezzo).

Plus: held well on a wet road in cold weather (+3/+5). Extremely soft, almost to a fault (I'm afraid it will wear off quickly). The price was attractive.

In general, I regret (a bit) not buying the Matrac.