Tyre reviews Kumho Wintercraft SUV Ice WS31. Page 4 361

The tire itself is good, it holds well on the road. However, it has difficulty pulling a heavy car (1.5 tons) with front-wheel drive through small snowdrifts and quickly gets stuck.

Impressive performance, driving through extremely difficult weather conditions, heavy snow, road slush, and ice underneath. The vehicle handled well, with a predictable stopping distance and good traction.

Went for two seasons, wear less than 5%, all studs are in place. Tires are soft and quiet, balancing is easy. Bought the same ones for my father, he's satisfied. Now I've bought a new set for myself. Made a mistake, bought it not from Mosavtoshina, was deceived by an advertisement. I'm extremely sorry.

Order no. 1341955. After purchasing, I drove on this tire for 2 months. I hesitated when buying it, but the tire turned out to be good. Snow, ice and wet asphalt handled normally. It meets the price and quality criteria. Let's see how long it lasts.

Hello. Great tire. Survived the winter. Looking forward to getting them again. Soft and quiet. Price is acceptable compared to Continental or Nokian. Don't see the point in overpaying. Have driven on all the mentioned tire models. Overall, I would recommend it to anyone still in doubt.

In general, the tire is rated as a 4 on a hard surface, performs well in snow, and performs well both on dry and wet asphalt. It's a bit more challenging on open ice, but the weight of the vehicle helps, and it can withstand 14,000 miles of wear without needing to be replaced, with only minor wear on the studs, which is less than 1 mm. It's also quiet and the price-to-quality ratio is excellent. It's not a Mich

Hi! I've only driven on this tire for 2,000 km so far. I've experienced all the winter road thrills: from fluffy snow to -30 degrees. My impressions of the tire are extremely positive: it grips the road well, doesn't make a racket, and even with ABS, it rarely kicks in when braking. I used to have a Contiwintercontact 5 (studded), which was 1.5 times more expensive. I'm

Reasonable price-quality ratio. Impressed by the relatively quiet ride on the highway. Good traction on ice and acceptable traction on snow.

I liked
The tire withstood a serious side cut well, which is why I was still able to drive 30 km to the tire shop, but it was no longer repairable.
For noise, I'd give it a 4.
It holds 2.3 tons from skidding. However, I haven't tried driving over 180 on it.

Excellent tires for the money. Replaced 10-year-old Hakka 7 with it, the difference is huge. Take it boldly. Murmansk region... Been using it for 4 months already. The spikes are quiet.