Tyre reviews Kumho KH27 Ecowing ES01. Page 2 369

When I bought the car, these tires came with it. I've driven about 15,000 km on them. In principle, the tires are good, but there's a minus - for me, they're a bit too noisy and have weak sidewalls. Not so long ago, one of the wheels got punctured, a piece was literally torn off from the sidewall. Apart from that, there are no minuses. On dry and wet roads, handling is good. I haven't noticed any aquaplaning, and I haven't driven into puddles either. It doesn't drift in turns. In terms of durability, it's good, the tread hasn't worn down significantly over 15,000 km.

Soft, quiet, road-holding tires. I drive on paved roads in the summer. I rarely drive on rough terrain.

There are more contemporary and interesting models.

The tire was very hard, which resulted in poor road traction, and there was virtually no wear on the tread. However, over time, the tire began to crack right down the middle of the sidewall and had to be discarded. It seemed as if if you drove carefully, taking into account the poor traction due to the lack of tire flexibility and tread wear, you could potentially drive for a long time on the same set of tires - a cost savings? NO! A cheaper Russian tire served me

I bought and installed them immediately as autumn arrived with rain and cooling down. The Bridgestone V250 had already covered 40,000 km and the remaining 4 mm or 2 mm of tread life were very harsh when driving through puddles. I was satisfied with the Bridgestone as they braked well on both dry and wet asphalt. In the end, I decided to try Korean tires, especially since I took ones with a load index of 88, which is perfect for my

Резина супер

Advantages: Excellent wheels
Disadvantages: None

Really good tires.

Best tire

The tires are not bad, they hold on water, but they only last for 3 seasons.