Tyre reviews Ikon Autograph Aqua 3. Page 1 92
- Rate
I decided to change my tires before vacation. I was mainly interested in tires that would actively resist aquaplaning. These tires caught my attention, allegedly invented specifically for wet roads (well, the spoiler is in the tire name). At the tire mounting shop, they heavily criticized it, saying it had a very thin sidewall. They even called it "foil". They advised me to be careful, saying that if I hit deep potholes, it would be the end. I even doubted my choice, because my old Michelin tires had thicker sidewalls. Two wheels were balanced with minimal weights (around 5-10 grams), and two were a bit more (around 30-40 grams). Overall, this didn't bother me. So, what can I say after driving 7,000 km on these tires: I like them and they fully satisfy me (except for the price, I wish it were cheaper). I drove on them from Moscow to my vacation in Dagestan. I moved along the highway at high speeds, overtaking and maneuvering perfectly, the car drove like it was on rails. There was no hint of skidding. Even in 39-degree heat, it didn't float, but confidently held the road. In the mountains, I drove on rocky terrain, sharp stones, and there were no cuts. On such roads, it also confidently climbed uphill, and the car climbed into difficult places where not everyone could pass. On the way, at high speed, I still fell into potholes, I think this can't be avoided. The tire survived all these tests with flying colors. No bulges were found. After the vacation, I drove from Moscow to St. Petersburg and back. I encountered heavy rain on the road, with water standing and not having time to drain. The car drove perfectly, with no hint of aquaplaning. At the same time, I also drove in the rain at high speeds, confidently gripping the asphalt and draining water. I believe the tire passed all the tests and provided comfort. The drawbacks are: it's a bit noisy, but I don't care about that. And the price, I would like it to be lower, of course, but that's the reality.
- Vehicle:
- Kia Cee'd
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought these tires because I previously used Hakkapeliitta Blue2 tires. The Hakkapeliitta Blue3 tires are essentially the same, but with our branding.
Regarding the tire:
2 out of 4 wheels were balanced to zero without adding weights. The other two required minimal weights.
The tread is just as excellent as the Blue2. I chose them partly because of the tread, as I have a manual transmission and I experience real fuel savings on long downhill stretches.
The noise level is low... no howling or resonance.
The resistance to aquaplaning is good, no worse than the Blue2, which handled rain well at high speeds.
The performance in temperatures of 3-5 degrees Celsius and on cold tires is not bad. I didn't notice any skidding when braking, and no wheelspin when starting. The braking distance is predictable.
As for the drawbacks:
My Hakkapeliitta Blue2 tires, which were manufactured in 2016, worked fine for 5 years, but then started to develop cracks and by 2024 were completely covered in cracks. At the same time, the tire wear sensor was at 6 out of 8. I hope the 3rd generation of these tires will be more resistant to aging. For those who replace their tires every 5 years, this issue won't be a problem...
Overall impression of the tire: the stated characteristics are present. It's definitely better than most products on the market. I give it a solid 5- . The only drawback is the cracking issue.- Vehicle:
- Skoda Octavia
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
I'm not buying this tire for the first time, it's a bit noisy, but it handles the road perfectly, in the rain it's a super grip, at high speed it feels confident. In general, for this money, it's a very good tire. The previous set lasted 4 seasons confidently, about 60k km. There was a reserve for the 5th season, but I decided to change it.
- Vehicle:
- Ford Focus
- Size:
- 205/55 R16 94V XL
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Despite the summer tire pattern, the rubber compound is more suitable for all-season tires. This conclusion is drawn from two aspects: in the summer, at speeds above 140, it is necessary to make adjustments, the car wanders on the road; and in the fall, in November, when driving far from the city and snow fell, there was no discomfort while driving. On snow, it "bit" even on a large incline, like on winter tires, without a single slip.
The tire is soft, quiet, from this I conclude that it will wear out quickly.
- Vehicle:
- Hyundai NF
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
I wrote a review of these tires in the summer of 2024. At that time, after purchasing, I had driven 7,000 km and was completely delighted. Overall, nothing has changed over this time, and I am still satisfied. Currently, the mileage on the tires is over 30,000 km. Over this mileage, the remaining tread depth is 2.5 mm (the tread has worn down to the indicators). Of course, I expected the tires to last longer, at least 40,000 km. In the first year, the tread wore down to 5 mm on the front tires and 6 mm on the rear tires (initially, it was 8 mm). And I drove around 15,000 km on them in the first season (summer 2024) and also around 15,000 km in the second season (summer 2025). In the second season, I swapped the front and rear tires, and the wear evened out. Throughout the entire period of use, there were no problems; the tires, although soft, are quite robust. They withstood repeated encounters with potholes. Overall, I am satisfied with the tires and can confidently recommend them for purchase. I bought a new set of the same tires for myself because I really like how the car handles on wet roads. Also, the fact that an extended warranty is available for the tires is a plus, which I successfully used when I got a puncture. The repair was done for free. P.S. I did not drive on ice or snow with these tires. I consider it incorrect to rate summer tires in such conditions, but to avoid lowering the overall rating in these categories, I gave 5 stars.
- Vehicle:
- Kia Cee'd
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Tire fire!
- Size:
- 205/65 R16 99V XL
- Rate
- Rate
Pleasant, soft enough. Moderately noisy.
- Size:
- 205/60 R16 96W XL
- Rate
- Rate
Excellent tires.
- Size:
- 205/60 R16 96W XL
- Rate





