Winter tire test 205/55 R16 from the publisher Авторевю 2013 p.

Eleven sets of non-directional tyres in size 205/55 R16 participated in the tests. The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2 was the most impressive newcomer of the season and proved to be the best in the end. Many of the participants in the test are well-known on the market, but they were tested for the first time in this test. The main focus was on their performance on ice. The test track used for measuring braking and acceleration distances was closed.
You can read the full text of the test at the following link: https://autoreview.ru/articles/test
Place Model Description / Recommendations Cost
1
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2
Grip on ice
High resistance to hydroplaning
Braking properties on wet and dry asphalt.
high price
Better than others suited for use in large cities

Hakkapeliitta R2 provided a minimum braking distance on both wet and dry asphalt. The car brakes and accelerates perfectly on ice. Good grip properties on snow, but sometimes lacks softness and smoothness of reactions when cornering. The cost of a set of such tires is quite high.

Score: 9.3
from 6 980 
2
Pirelli Winter Ice Control
Ice grip
Snow and ice handling
Tractive performance
Traction capabilities on snow, low impact resistance
It is recommended to drive very carefully on broken and repaired sections.

Tires almost won the test. The shortest braking distance both on ice and snow. The car responds sensitively and accurately to steering wheel turns, and the only thing that fails on winter surfaces is the poor acceleration dynamics on snow. Winter IceControl is one of the most comfortable.

Designers reduced the thickness of the sidewalls. As a result, the tires burst earlier than others.

Score: 9.2
from 5 850 
3
Continental ContiVikingContact 5
Traction and handling on asphalt
braking on snow
impact resistance.
Traction properties on ice and snow
The balance is shifted in favor of asphalt behavior, so the tires are more suitable for city dwellers.

The ContiVikingContact 5 tires only let two competitors ahead. The lag is due to the low performance on ice, transverse skidding starts early, so it's impossible to gain speed on the track. On snow, the tires work much better, especially when braking.

The speed doesn't need to be reduced much, the car easily enters turns. They performed very well on asphalt.

Score: 8.9
from 6 290 
4
Bridgestone Blizzak REVO GZ
High impact resistance
Excellent traction on ice
Excellent traction and handling on asphalt.
Braking performance on snow
handling on ice and snow
Tires are created specifically for Russian conditions.

In terms of longitudinal coupling properties on ice, they lost only to Nokian and Pirelli. And in terms of the time it takes to pass the ice circle, they are generally the best. The Revo GZ tread provides good grip on smooth ice.

On snow, the tread looks worse, the lack of coupling is especially felt when braking and turning. On asphalt, with braking and handling, everything is in order. The frame is maximally strengthened, the tires perfectly withstand the impact when driving onto an obstacle.

Score: 8.7
from 5 320 
5
Michelin X-Ice 3
Comfort
Traction on ice
Insufficient resistance to slash penetration
low impact strength
Recommended for calm drivers who prioritize comfort.

The X-Ice 3 showed balanced behavior on ice. Skidding on the track is slightly stretched, but the car's reaction is always clear and predictable. On snow, it's harder to drive, the car brakes poorly, in turns it gets stuck in skidding for a long time, dangerously approaching snowdrifts.

In standard modes, driving on asphalt is comfortable and easy, but you can't sharply drive around a pothole, and it's highly undesirable to hit it. The tires are in the trio of the weakest in terms of impact resistance.

Score: 8.6
from 8 170 
6
Yokohama Ice Guard IG50
Longitudinal traction properties on ice
Acceleration dynamics on snow
Braking properties on snow and wet asphalt
insufficient resistance to slashplaining
A decent option in terms of price and quality.

The tires pleased with their traction properties when accelerating and braking on ice. However, when cornering, the vehicle skids on the front axle.

On snow, the model differs in polarity of qualities. On the one hand, the best acceleration time, on the other - the maximum braking distance. Moreover, almost the worst time on the handling track.

On asphalt, the traction properties are moderate. From the point of view of comfort, the tires are quiet, but not the softest.

Score: 8.3
from 5 660 
6
Hankook W605 Winter i cept
Traction and handling on ice, price.
Traction properties and handling on asphalt
low impact strength
Recommended for residents of the poor outback.

Pleasantly surprised by the coupling properties on ice. The best time on the handling track, confident braking and acceleration. On snow, the tires are unimpressive. On the handling track, they were marked by deep oversteer of the rear axle. Acceleration and braking are quite tolerable.

Terrible braking on wet and dry asphalt.

Scores: 8.3
from 7 980 
6
Kumho I Zen KW31
Longitudinal traction on snow
handling on ice
price
Snow handling
traction properties on wet asphalt
low ride smoothness
On ice, in turns the tires somehow hold on, but the traction properties in the longitudinal direction are mediocre.

On snow, the situation is slightly better. The handling track passage time is decent, but the car's behavior in turns is unstable. They brake poorly on any asphalt.

Score: 8.3
from 2 890 
7
Viatti Brina
High treadwear resistance
on-road handling
price.
ice handling
low ride smoothness
A decent price-to-quality ratio.

In various tests, the tires consistently outperformed several competitors. Best in the slaloming resistance test.

The car's reactions to steering wheel turns are fast and accurate. The damping capabilities of the tires leave much to be desired.

Score: 8.2
from 3 380 
8
Nordman RS
Braking performance on snow
Snow traction and control
ice and asphalt handling
noise
They are in their element in snowy wilderness.

If when braking and accelerating on ice, the tires somehow counter their competitors, then on the handling track - an unconditional surrender.

Sensitive and precise reactions to steering wheel and gas actions. On asphalt, the soft tread poorly withstands increased loads, the car starts to skid early. The tires are very noisy, which is especially noticeable on turns.

Score: 8.1
from 5 271 
9
Dmack Winter Safe
High slash resistance
braking performance on wet asphalt
price.
traction properties and handling on ice
Recommended for large cities.

On snow, the grip is not bad, especially when braking. But in turns, on the highway, the car is uncontrollable.

The tires confidently handle snowy-watery slush, and behave decently on asphalt.

Score: 7.6