Summer tire test 235/55 R19 from the publisher Teknikens Varld 2025 p.

Short braking distance on dry and wet pavement
Excellent handling on wet roads

Increased noise
Increased rolling resistance

Tires with excellent driving qualities in any conditions, so a slightly increased noise and not the best fuel economy can be tolerated

Short braking distance on wet surface
High level of comfort
Very low rolling resistance

Poor resistance to longitudinal aquaplaning

Comfortable tires that successfully combine low rolling resistance with high grip on wet roads, but there is also a fly in the ointment, namely poor resistance to aquaplaning

Short braking distance on dry surfaces
Very high resistance to aquaplaning

Relatively low level of comfort

Tires work stably in any situation and have no significant drawbacks

Short braking distance on dry pavement
High stability in the moose test

Increased rolling resistance
Non-optimal informativeness

Good premium tires without obvious weaknesses

Short braking distance on wet roads
Excellent resistance to longitudinal aquaplaning

Poor directional stability

In a number of key parameters, they can compete on an equal footing with premium products, but apparently, investments in improving characteristics also led to an increase in prices

Short braking distance on wet surfaces
Good resistance to aquaplaning

Reduced comfort level
Increased rolling resistance

Tires perform well in various conditions, but differ in rigid movement and are offered at a high price

In summer conditions, they lose to specialized summer tires, as, for example, they react sluggishly to steering wheel turns and have a pronounced tendency to skidding.

Good resistance to aquaplaning
Good level of comfort

Poor handling on wet roads
Very weak grip during emergency obstacle avoidance

Budget tires that cannot provide acceptable handling on wet pavement, and during sharp maneuvers on dry roads, stability is even lower than that of some winter tires. Not recommended to buy