Winter tire test 175/65 R14 from the publisher ADAC 2018 p.

Place Model Description / Recommendations Cost
1
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 860
Rating: Good

Wet road: 1.7
Dry road: 2.3
Snow: 1.8
Ice: 2.5
Noise: 3.5
Durability: 2.0
Fuel efficiency: 2.2
from 6 090 
2
Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
Rating: Good

Wet road: 1,8
Dry road: 2,4
Snow: 1,9
Ice: 2,5
Noise: 3,4
Wear resistance: 2,0
Fuel efficiency: 1,7
3
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Rating: Satisfactory

Wet road: 2,6
Dry road: 2,0
Snow: 2,3
Ice: 2,5
Noise: 3,3
Wear resistance: 2,0
Fuel efficiency: 1,8
4
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Satisfactory

Wet road: 2,4
Dry road: 2,6
Snow: 2,7
Ice: 2,4
Noise: 3,8
Wear resistance: 2,0
Fuel efficiency: 2,2
from 7 390 
5
Goodyear Ultragrip 9
Rating: Satisfactory

Wet road: 2.2
Dry road: 2.6
Snow: 2.8
Ice: 2.5
Noise: 3.5
Wear resistance: 1.5
Fuel efficiency: 1.8
from 7 670 
6
Debica Frigo 2
Rating: Satisfactory

Wet road: 2.9
Dry road: 2.9
Snow: 2.2
Ice: 2.5
Noise: 3.5
Wear resistance: 2.0
Fuel efficiency: 2.2
7
Rating: Satisfactory

Wet road: 2.4
Dry road: 2.5
Snow: 2.9
Ice: 2.5
Noise: 3.3
Wear resistance: 2.0
Fuel efficiency: 1.6
8
Sava Eskimo S3+
Rating: Satisfactory

Wet road: 2.9
Dry road: 2.9
Snow: 2.2
Ice: 2.5
Noise: 3.5
Wear resistance: 2.0
Fuel efficiency: 2.1
from 2 380 
9
Rating: Satisfactory

Wet road: 2,9
Dry road: 2,3
Snow: 2,2
Ice: 2,5
Noise: 3,9
Wear resistance: 2,5
Fuel efficiency: 1,8
10
Pirelli Winter Cinturato
Rating: Satisfactory

Wet road: 2,4
Dry road: 3,1
Snow: 2,2
Ice: 2,5
Noise: 3,2
Wear resistance: 3,0
Fuel efficiency: 2,0
from 2 310 
11
Rating: Good

Wet road: 2.5
Dry road: 3.7
Snow: 2.0
Ice: 2.5
Noise: 3.8
Wear resistance: 2.5
Fuel efficiency: 2.4
12
Nankang SV2
Rating: Poor

Wet road: 4,7
Dry road: 2,5
Snow: 5,5
Ice: 2,5
Noise: 3,5
Treadwear: 2,0
Fuel efficiency: 2,7