Summer tire test, size 205/55 R16 from the publisher Autobild 2016 p.

Tires are a crucial component of a vehicle, but as noted by Auto Bild, Chinese users generally only care about noise level, durability and rolling resistance when choosing tires, giving less attention to braking performance, which is certainly an incorrect approach. As one of the responsibilities of automotive magazines is to raise drivers' awareness of the importance of different tire characteristics, AB conducted its tests again this year to compare ten models of summer tires.

The list of tested tires:
B
Place Model Description / Recommendations Cost
1
Michelin Primacy 3
Performance in all conditions
resistance to lateral aquaplaning
price
Final score: 8.1/10

Michelin tires have always had a good reputation, and in this test, they performed above average from the start, which earned them the winner status. Michelin has very good handling in all conditions, and their weakness only appeared in the lateral aquaplaning test, where they dropped to the second-to-last place. For this reason, it is recommended to slow down before turns on a wet road when driving on these tires.
You have to pay for all the good things, and the best tires in the test also have the highest price
from 10 500 
2
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5
Handling
Comfort Level
rolling
noise
Overall rating: 8.1/10

Continental demonstrated excellent handling on both dry and wet surfaces, and they also received very high subjective ratings for comfort level. However, in the noise test, Continental rolling noise ranked second to last. This is something they still need to work on.
Very balanced tires that only lost to Michelin (and only due to noise level)
3
Dry Handling
Aqua-planing resistance
Final rating: 7.5/10

The test involved second-generation tires that are currently only available on the Chinese market. Overall, Goodyear had very good results in all tests, particularly in dry handling tests, where they took first place. At the same time, Goodyear demonstrated relatively weak resistance to aquaplaning, which may be due to the characteristics of the tread pattern or the composition of the rubber compound.
There is still room for improvement, and the resistance to aquaplaning could be even higher
4
Nexen N'Fera SU4
Comfort Level
Rolling Resistance
average handling and traction ratings
Final score: 7.5/10

Nexen tires were most surprising for their extremely low rolling resistance, and also, the Korean brand's tires have the highest level of comfort. In terms of external noise, Nexen also performed well, taking fourth place in the corresponding test. However, in terms of handling and grip on dry and wet surfaces, Nexen still significantly lags behind the tires of top-tier brands and is unlikely to take the lead in tests anytime soon.
A dark horse that brought a few surprises. However, the overall results are average.
from 4 380 
5
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Price
Tire performance balance
Final score: 7.2/10

Among all the tested tires, Bridgestone showed the "most average" results, but at the same time, they did not have a single obvious shortcoming. Considering the price, Bridgestone would be a good choice, and they have a good balance between driving performance and comfort, which may be the reason why they are often equipped in new cars in China.
Tires with average performance, choosing which is unlikely to be a disappointment
6
Wanli Harmonic H220
Price
Low noise level
handling on dry surface
comfort
Final rating: 7.0/10

Wanli were the cheapest tires in the test, however, they were able to take a quite decent for the price sixth place, outpacing in the process tires of several much more well-known brands. Wanli have a very low noise level, as well as second place in the rolling resistance test. At the same time, handling on a dry surface and comfort could be better.
Tires with the lowest price, but not the worst results
8
Yokohama Advan dB v551
Low noise level
braking
safety
handling
Final score: 6.6/10

Yokohama ultimately finished in eighth place, as their performance can't be considered exemplary. The tires have insufficient handling on dry pavement, and on wet surfaces, it was even worse, especially in terms of braking - in this discipline, Yokohama took last place with a disappointing result, and this parameter directly affects safety. Additionally, Yokohama was the only tire that lost a large chunk of tread after testing on dry surfaces.
The only tires that failed to keep the tread intact, which raises some concerns
9
Landsail LS388
Rolling resistance
Low cost
General results at the medium level
Final rating: 6.2/10

Landsail has participated in AB tests before, and if the Landsail LS288 previously performed, to put it mildly, not ideally, then the Landsail LS388 turned out to be even worse, and in fact, the only thing they can stand out with is their low price. The official website claims that the tires combine a high level of comfort with improved traction on wet surfaces, but these statements have been found to be far from true. In almost all disciplines, Landsail took a place either in the middle or at the very bottom of the rating, and they were only able to excel in the rolling resistance test. It's worth noting that Landsail had the highest load index in the test, which may have had a negative impact on driving qualities.
Compared to the Landsail LS288, this is not progress, but a step back
from 2 820 
10
Toyo Proxes C100 plus
price
all indicators below average
Final rating: 6.1/10

Toyo ranks last in the rating, and at the same time, they are not the cheapest in the test. On a dry surface, the tires performed poorly, and on a wet surface, they encountered serious problems, with Toyo taking last place in almost all disciplines. Since Toyo also has high rolling resistance, it's hard to come up with a reason why anyone would want to buy them.
The tires showed extremely poor results, so it's not recommended to buy them