Tyre reviews Windforce Snowblazer UHP. Страница 3 2024

The tire is not bad.. It holds the road well.. On ice, it's bad "like a cow".. It's a bit stiff.. to me, this is a good all-season tire rather than a studded one... Koromorans are much softer..

Good tires do not concede in quality to well-known brands. I have no complaints about these tires. I will definitely buy more.

For the money, the tires are great! Not the quietest, but not too loud either.
Bought for southern winter - just what I needed. Happy with the tires.

I bought these tires in 2022. The main criteria for choosing this model were reviews and price. In winter, I drive mainly in the city, with rare long trips, and in this regard, I decided to try Chinese tires (I had not bought them before).
The pros of the tires:
- price
- wear resistance.
The cons:
- Poor traction on wet roads
- Poor traction in snowy slush/ice conditions
- Too soft (at least for southern regions, as soon as the temperature rises above 0, the car floats, becomes like jelly)
- Soft sidewall of the tire (hitting a small pothole bent the disc)
- Hum from the tires.
In my personal opinion, the tires are suitable for urban use at low speeds. I didn't like the grip with the road, after installing winter tires, the stabilization and ABS started working much more often. Before that, I had Nexen Winguard 2005 tires! They behaved much better in all modes.

Immediately after installing new tires, a vibration appeared. After conducting an examination, Mosavtoshina reported that no defects were found. At the same time, at another tire shop, it was clearly established that the tire has a defect of 22 kg

Hello. The tires are good for their price, but only for a year. In the second year, the wheels started to vibrate, like driving on balls. Specifically, on the stand, they bounce up and down. They said that now they are suitable for the trash. Mileage is less than 10,000 km.

The region of operation is the Krasnodar region. To understand the operating conditions, winter means not very low negative temperatures, up to -10 to -12 at night, and not throughout the entire calendar winter. Mostly it's rain and wet weather, followed by ice and not very often snow.

I've driven about 10,000 km on these tires.

On ice, at low speeds of up to 40 km/h and a sufficient distance, they brake acceptably. In the rain, they perform excellently! If you drive directly on snow, they handle well. The tire is soft, it holds the road perfectly. Wear is normal. They seem a bit noisy to me, but again, I've never had a Michelin, and at the price of my set per tire, there's nothing to compare it to.

I think the tire is worthy of consideration, at least in our region, where many people drive on summer tires all year round.

Solid 4 out of 5. Price/quality - excellent.

Excellent tires, very satisfied. Not noisy, soft, and holds very well on snow. I thought Chinese tires were bad, but it's no worse than renowned manufacturers that cost three times more. I don't see the point in overpaying for a brand. I'll continue to buy Chinese tires. Previously, I had Pirelli, terrible, hard tires, no comfort while driving, and it only lasted for 90,000 km, but there was no comfort at all, every bump was felt, and no matter what you did, what pressure you pumped, it was still wooden. In general, I definitely recommend Windforce for purchase, you won't regret it. And it's reasonably priced.

While the end of autumn rolled back to -10, they hold up excellently, since mainly dry frozen asphalt is on the way. What will happen in winter slush, we'll see.

The tire is normal, even if you don't consider the price. There is no discomfort, it holds the dry and wet road acceptably, the noise level is not higher than that of the previous Gislaved. I reshoed the car in the fall (tore one tire to pieces, decided to experiment in the fall, thought if the rubber is so-so, I'll buy another one in the spring) for about 30,000 rubles. Compare it to Western brands, where the price starts at 80 for a set. I recommend it.