Tyre reviews Росава WQ-102. Page 1 39

Installed out of necessity after GoodYear UG-500. An urgent trip to Nizhny Novgorod was coming up, and one of the GoodYear tires had burst. The car was unrecognizable! Literally everything was annoying! This included the lack of directional stability (on the previous one, you could release the steering wheel without changing trajectory), and riding comfort (low-frequency hum, like on a trolleybus, and quite hard) I can't say anything about snow and

Tire is crap!!!
I put it on my Lada 2110 and it can't be balanced, the car is being pulled to the side. I exchanged it at the store for AMTEL NORD MASTER-TIRE SUPER. I compared the quality inside and Rosava G-NO DON'T BUY!!!
Pros: Beautiful tread.
Cons: Expensive for such quality!!!Rating:

Very pleasant impression

Installed yesterday after a snowfall on the Renault Megane 2. In winter, I don't drive over 120...Traveled from Kherson to Nikolaev...The ice is terrible - a blizzard....There are plenty of foreign cars in the ditches...I was driving at 70 km/h like a tank - you can even let go of the wheel....A pleasant hum - it's immediately clear that the tires are biting into the snow. Buy it!

Considering the price, it's okay.

I bought them back in November, immediately studded and installed all 4 wheels. For the almost three months that I've been driving, I'm very satisfied. Given the amount of snow, ice, mud, and so on, it's just super. I can climb almost any hill, and I haven't gotten stuck even once. On one hill where a Lada got stuck, I was able to drive up without any problems. In sl

This is awful!!! The price is 350 UAH - there are no advantages except for the appearance!

I've been driving on Continental Contact Eco EP summer and corresponding Continental winter tires for 3 years. I tried Rosava WQ on my Ford Fiesta - it's a disaster!! The handling is like a tractor - the car leans into turns at 70-80, whereas with Continentals I could pass at 90-110. Handling is the Fiesta's strong point.. Now the

A good choice for the price

I bought it on the advice of a friend, his friend drove the previous winter without any problems and was satisfied. I don't have any particular complaints about this tire. The only thing is that it's quite noisy while driving, at first it was a bit unusual, but over time you get used to it and don't notice the noise anymore. It seemed that the lower the temperature, the softer this tire becomes. I accelerated to 170 on dry asphalt

Excellent tires! Why pay more?!
Balances well, holds the road perfectly in almost all weather conditions. Unusual sound when entering a puddle at high speed, but aquaplaning is completely absent. Makes noise like any winter tire on asphalt.
Pros: Price - quality
Cons: Not identified

It's worth its money

I installed 185/60R14 on VAZ 21114 in November 2007. Mileage for the winter is 6,000 km. Noise level is normal, as for winter tires. Handling on dry asphalt at a speed of 140 km/h and at -5 is very good - the car doesn't "float" (if you drive a car, you understand me, ONLY "TIRE TRADING MANAGERS WHO WRITE ALL KIND

Completely satisfied with the choice!!!

Despite skeptical reviews of "Rosava" products, I purchased WQ 102 (non-studded) and noted that in terms of noise, "Barum" is definitely noisier, which means it's at an acceptable level even compared to more expensive competitors. It balances perfectly, and that says a lot. I convinced my friend to buy WQ 102 and so far, he's satisfied with both the result and the money saved!

So far, so good.
I bought them for 372 UAH per wheel. The rubber is good. So far, no complaints. Whether on ice, snow crust, or "mash", the car confidently holds the road. It hums slightly on dry asphalt, but it's not annoying. I think it's the best price/quality ratio on the market.
Pros: Price/quality ratio
Cons: None found