Tyre reviews Matador MP-51 Sibir 2. Страница 2 69

I'm pleased, like an elephant!!!

Undoubtedly, there is better rubber, I think it's foolish to argue with that. Plus, probably the fact that I put winter tires on for the first time in ten years behind the wheel plays a role. It only fails to hold in a 90-degree turn on ice when slightly exceeding a reasonable speed for the winter period. Mud, snow, snowy mush, deep snow - everything is great! When everyone, including those with ABS,

Indeed, winter tires for little money

I bought it in a studded version. I didn't start racing right away, but as it should be, I ran it in. The impressions are the most positive. In those places where I used to helplessly slip, I now confidently move forward. I got into situations where thanks to this tire, I was able to get out of places where I would have clearly gotten stuck with a different tire. It pulls forward with traction and with wheels

NOT WORSE used BRIDGESTONE!

Rode out the winter, very pleased. Especially after the wooden NEXEN, just a fairy tale. Before that, I inherited used Bridgestones (studs) with the car, Sibir surprisingly at least no worse. All tires are non-studded, I was afraid of ours, especially after the Korean one. Sibir was enough for our Siberian roads, although I drive mainly in the city (Krasnoy

excellent tire

already driven 5000 km, not a single stud lost, ran in for 500 km. The car is rear-wheel drive Mark2, powerful and without electronics. It goes into a skid, but only when I want it to. It's not too loud, maybe it's just that the car has good sound insulation. It takes 30-degree inclines without any issues. There were no incidents during the winter weeks in Almaty. I just really liked

excellent
I'm satisfied with the purchase. I've been using them for the third winter already. The studs are in place, although in the city the snow is cleared on time and I have to drive on asphalt. I'm impressed by the lack of noise, my wife's Amtelek makes a distinct humming noise!
Pros: price. Soft, quiet
Cons: Quality is not linear, they are balanced differently. You need to choose.

Excellent choice

Driven 15,000 km, not a single stud lost. The tires are super, soft and almost noiseless. The only thing is that on asphalt at speeds over 60 km/h, the noise from the tires is like having a diesel engine in the car. My neighbor has Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5, he says that Matador is even better in snow (and has a shorter braking distance) and wobbles less at speed. I drive a

215/55/16
Installed on my Mitsubishi Galant, drove 5 thousand kilometers in winter, not a single stud came off... Handles the road super... Neither snow nor mud is an obstacle, didn't get stuck once, although I drove through some tough spots... In general, very satisfied... 5 points!
Pros: super
Cons: didn't notice

Excellent.

First winter. First car. Nothing to compare with. But all winter long, not a single stud was lost, although I changed only 5 in the summer. There were skids when turning 90 degrees at 60 km/h on a 5-8 cm layer of slushy snow and mud on ice (although few would have withstood such a maneuver), but excellent braking always saved me. And not just once. On any asphalt from -20 to +20

Good tires for a good price

Unexpectedly nice. Soft, completely predictable and almost silent tires. I was afraid, to be honest, that the domestic manufacturer would disappoint - my first Russian tires after five years of using Korean and Japanese ones. It climbs uphill with ease, in any snowfall without fear that it will start to skid, you can drive onto the divider, regardless of whether it's cleared or not. On ice, it brakes perfectly!!! I've driven 2 thousand kilometers

The tire is quite good in all respects except for the rapid wear. The tire was used on the Mercedes 124 rear-wheel drive.