Tyre reviews Matador MP-72 Izzarda A/T 2. Page 3 140

Matador belongs to the Continental, which means: quality control! Production in Kaluga. I have a friend at this factory, he recommended these tires. I wanted to buy through him, but the price with his discounts and in this store differed by 1000 rubles per set. I didn't want to bother the person, and the gasoline to Kaluga and back))).

In general, they were nicely balanced, weigh reasonably, up to 110 km/h, not comfortable for

The tire is worth its money. A regular AT without claims to off-road. Will take you where you need to go. And where it won't take you - you don't need to go there. In snow and mud, it gets clogged, but crawls. On ice, don't expect miracles from it. In the middle lane, it wore out over 3 seasons and approximately 80,000 km of mileage.

I chose them based on the price-quality parameter. Gives brutality to the car. Easily expressed off-road pattern. Noisy though. Good grip on off-road while sidewalls are alive. It seemed to me that it wears out quickly. Possibly due to the weight of the car and driving style. I drove for three seasons. Wanted to take again, didn't find.

The tire is normal, I previously bought it for Niva and was satisfied. Now I've taken it for Vitaru, and it drives decently on forest roads for AT, and it's also great on wet dirt roads! On asphalt, it's quiet (well, quieter than the old Geolander) and it's also good on wet surfaces, doesn't slip. The tire is soft, of course, the wear will be, after 4k km only the edges of the tread are worn out, and that's less than a millimeter. In short, for its price, it's an excellent tire.

I looked at this tire for a very long time. I was confused by its weight. I was afraid of the load on the gearbox and drivetrain. But when I saw the discount, everything was decided by itself. The period of operation is one summer season. I'm very pleased in all respects. The type of tread, the reinforced sidewall. At high speeds, it doesn't hum, of course, it also depends on the road surface. On dirt, sand, it rides like on asphalt. It doesn't notice aquaplaning. I didn't measure the braking distance, but in my opinion, it's excellent. The only downsides are that it's heavier than other AT tires and at high speeds, active driving, wear is visible. But for myself, I decided that if they don't stop selling them, I'll buy another one.

Volvo XC90, the previous tire for winter Blizac, then I put the completely by chance MATADOR CONGUERRA MP84 Suv, so it is and drove 3 years 60000 not changing winter-summer, very soft compound, it is certified as all-season, in winter perfectly and ice and mush and snow, I think it's better than Blizac, the only minus, when rubbing against the curb, it damages the side wall due to softness,

Bought based on user reviews. The tire is not bad, comfortable in terms of noise up to 110, but does not balance as well as written. Light off-road, gravel, sandstone, wet grass, that's all. Aquaplaning is present at speeds over 90. After a mileage of 10,000, vibration started, here you need to play with the pressure in the tire.

Mileage of about 5000, behaves with dignity, in mud like all tires gets clogged, but seems to drive, in this regard better than Yokohama Geolandar. Durable, soft, on the highway at 140 km/h behaves well. When balancing by weights, not much, from 30 to 70 grams per wheel. It is necessary, after installation, to drive a little more than 1000 km, and then re-balance, it will be even better. In terms of price-quality, the optimal option. Bought the same ones for other SUVs. Don't drive on them in winter, have studded tires

A very good, high-quality tire. We bought it for a work car, for driving on off-road terrain (2/3 rocky soil). It has covered 50,000 km. Now we've taken another set of the same tires.

I recommend buying it!

The C-RV is not an off-road vehicle. For this car, it's enough for not quite intimidating off-road conditions. After rain, when driving up a clay hill with a small rut, it came out quite confidently. I haven't tried it in winter.