Tyre reviews Kumho Solus KH15. Page 2 572

Tires are a delight! Withstood the summer of 2010 at an air temperature of over 42°C and speeds up to 200km/h without deflating. Resistant to heavy rain and high-speed maneuvers. Mileage of 35,000 km. The tires are mounted on a new Chevrolet Epica (Evanda 2.0) 2008 model. Durable wear. Made in Korea. I have not driven on snow and ice, I give it 5

I have a Magentis 2008, it was like a basic one, the tires have gone through 2 seasons, it will be the third, 40,000 km I have nothing bad to say, the car handles normally, highway-city mostly at speed confidently accelerated to 210 the car does not float and does not throw, moderately noisy, wear - normal, off-road 1 time stuck in the mud, sand was poorly dug out several times, price-quality - justified.

It's worth the extra money for budget brand tires, and it's also better than many expensive brands, as well!! great ride, low noise level of the tires, lots of grip on dry, hangs on well and plus it's good on wet roads too!! Good one Kumho!! Recommended!!

This is for all those R12 owners like me, for whom this somewhat rare piece of furniture, specific reviews of the New Primera are lacking. Well, I've just fitted a full set of replacement KH15s because, although I have no experience of other makes on this car, the Kumhos have satisfied in many hundreds, that I don't want to risk changing, and be disappointed. Of course, there are more expensive tyres, but would they be much better? I consider Kumhos

The tires are normal for their price

Reviews are varied, but for one strange reason - those who had tires in the basic configuration all say they are bad. Those who purchased separate tires (like me) are quite satisfied. I think that in the basic configuration, either the tires are non-standard or the factory is "Chinese". Today I tried them in rainy weather and they performed very well. On dry roads, there are also no complaints. Soft and smooth, excellent.

At the time of writing this review, I have driven 46,000 km on these tires. They also came with my Nissan, apparently Nissan has a contract with this company. I wouldn't say they're complete junk, but considering the price, they're average. If you're not racing on them, they handle the road normally and are manageable on wet asphalt, but they are very noisy.

Came from the factory, wanted to change immediately but had no time, so left it as is. Result: very noisy, removed winter tires (drove on Bridgestone), no difference, still very noisy, was very surprised, first time this happened. At 15,000 km, the right front wheel unwound, the central tread started to delaminate and unwound like a ball of yarn, and after another 500 km, the sidewall burst on the left front wheel

Cheap tires of average quality

When I bought them for 1900 rubles, I thought they were good. On dry asphalt, they drive fairly well. They make an average noise. In 5000 km, I got two blowouts, although I wasn't in big potholes and didn't even notice right away. But driving in the rain on wet asphalt is scary! On a Ford Mondeo, above 70 km/h, I have to constantly steer, the car is

It also came with the Almera 2007

It's just a DISASTER. Noisy is not the word, it howls starting from 40 km/h. It doesn't hold the road AT ALL, neither on dry nor on wet asphalt. Once it skidded well on wet asphalt, and that was at 50 km/h, on a slightly steep slope, I slightly pressed the brake pedal. I no longer consider KUMHO (TIRE) as a

Good tires

I was hesitant to buy or not. I wanted Michelin, but acquaintances who are sellers in the market dissuaded me. They said that Russian-made tires are better not to buy. It turned out that there were no other options. And to the touch, they are better than Goodyear or Barum (for the same money). I took a risk and bought them. Previously, I had Debica Vivo (71,000 km). I thought I'd make