Tyre reviews Kumho Ecsta HS52. Page 27 944

Rubber October 2025, for 3000₽ class.

Holds very well in sharp turns, not noisy, no aquaplaning

It seems there's no text related to the automotive tire industry provided for translation. However, I will attempt to translate the given text:

Юждюшо на зщл

Translates to:
No meaningful translation can be provided as the text does not appear to be a coherent sentence or phrase in any language. If you provide a correct text related to the automotive tire industry, I'll be happy to assist with the translation.

Excellent tires! The best in this price range! The previous one lasted 65,000 for five years of year-round use (Krasnodar)! And it would have lasted even longer, but I got a puncture and decided it was time to change them anyway! Thanks to WB and the seller! I recommend!

Excellent tires.

Hello, I've never written a review before, but this time I'll make an exception and compare it to Hankook tires. The tire is quiet, on dry asphalt, the directional stability and trackability are not bad, but the aquaplaning is poor! (However, if your speed is not high, no more than 80 km/h, then it's not bad). With Hankook tires, I didn't experience such terrible aquaplaning as with this tire. This tire is only suitable for city driving, and to top it off, at the end of the season, I had to replace 3 tires, but I didn't buy them from mosautoshina, so it's not pleasant (money down the drain)

Not a bad tire. Matches the price and quality.

The tires are excellent, the only minus is that they skid on grass off-road.