Tyre reviews Kumho Ecsta HS52. Page 27 966

  • Kumho Ecsta HS52
    Kumho Ecsta HS52

Статистика отзывов на шины Kumho Ecsta HS52

Ниже отображены сводные характеристики шины, основанные на отзывах и оценках автовладельцев со всего мира.
При учёте общей оценки летней шины её показатели на снегу и льду не учитываются.

  • Средняя оценка шин Kumho Ecsta HS52 пользователями сайта: 4.7572 из 5
  • Количество отзывов на шины Kumho Ecsta HS52: 957 шт.
  • Место в рейтинге: 345
  • Место в рейтинге (летние): 210
Control on a dry road
Steering in the wet
Drive comfort
Quiet in motion
Braking efficiency
Resistant to aquaplaning
Velocity characteristics
Wearability
Quality of production
Price justifiability
Все оценки пользователей
Оценки реальных покупателей

Оценки шин Kumho Ecsta HS52 по месяцам

По распределению
оценок

1
2%
2
1%
3
2%
4
8%
5
88%
  • about tyre Kumho Ecsta HS52

    Rate
    3.7

    The tire was liked, a bit noisy, but in principle, you can turn up the music or install an additional noise canceller. 2023 tire from China. When balancing, there was only one weight of 20 grams, in principle, for a 17-inch diameter, it's very well made

    Vehicle:
    Kia Sportage
    Buy again?:
    Definitely yes
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Kumho Ecsta HS52

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    4.9

    After the circumstances, at the end of the summer season, I had to change the summer tires. Prices are not small these days, so I searched for info on forums and came to the conclusion that Kumho is not expensive but good tires. I bought them. So far, I'm satisfied.

    Vehicle:
    Lada Largus Cross
    Size:
    205/55 R16 91V
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    City:
    Moscow
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Kumho Ecsta HS52

    Rate
    3.2

    I bought 235/55/17. Considering the price increase, I chose between new cheap and second-hand famous ones. Previously, I used Toyo Proxes 2, Michelin Energy 2, Hankook Dana Pro, and Michelin Primacy 3. I chose tread tires for the Ford crossover. When choosing, I analyzed the test results where the predecessor of the Extensa HS51 occupied 3-4 positions and differed in balance, good comfort characteristics (noise and bump passage), handling, and braking. The Extensa HS52 promised to be even better. Of course, it was alarming that in some tests, the HS51 occupied lagging positions))) The result is that this is the noisiest tire from personal use over the past 15 years. Even Toyo is quieter. For me, this characteristic is very important. After Michelin Primacy 3, I feel like a noise maker was thrown into the car, the first meters after installation made me think that the windows were open. At a speed of up to 80, the noise is tolerable, at 120 it's just awful. Softness: yes, it is present. In this regard, the tires remind me of Michelin Energy, but only remind me. Unlike Michelin, the Kumho has a poor reaction to the steering wheel. In comparison with Michelin Primacy 3, Kumho is just jelly. Michelin is both soft and manageable, (mostly up to 120 km/h). I changed the pressure from 2.5 to 1.9 atm. Also, the passage of bumps and irregularities was disappointing. Although the tires are soft enough, the bumps are reflected in the entire car. The Michelin Energy is a great example, on them you just get a thrill of how the car passes through the bumps on our roads. Even Hankook Dana Pro is quieter and more understandable, although it's a tire for crossovers. I'm disappointed with the purchase. I've driven 600 km, some people write that after running-in at 1000 km they will become quieter, I really hope so)

    Vehicle:
    Ford Kuga
    Buy again?:
    Absolutely not
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Kumho Ecsta HS52

    Rate
    3.2

    за 2 сезона протектор в разрывах, на мокрой дороге и в колее плохо

    Vehicle:
    Lada Vesta SW Cross
    Buy again?:
    Absolutely not
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • Feedback about tyre Kumho Ecsta HS52

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    5

    The tires look not bad, one tire is 4425, the others are 4525 "week year"

    Size:
    185/60 R14 82H
    Rate
  • about tyre Kumho Ecsta HS52

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    5

    Rubber October 2025, for 3000₽ class.

    Size:
    185/60 R14 82H
    Rate
  • about tyre Kumho Ecsta HS52

    Rate
    4.9

    Holds very well in sharp turns, not noisy, no aquaplaning

    Vehicle:
    Ford Focus
    Buy again?:
    Definitely yes
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • Feedback about tyre Kumho Ecsta HS52

    Rate
    2

    It seems there's no text related to the automotive tire industry provided for translation. However, I will attempt to translate the given text:

    Юждюшо на зщл

    Translates to:
    No meaningful translation can be provided as the text does not appear to be a coherent sentence or phrase in any language. If you provide a correct text related to the automotive tire industry, I'll be happy to assist with the translation.

    Size:
    225/65 R17 102V
    Rate
  • about tyre Kumho Ecsta HS52

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    5

    Excellent tires! The best in this price range! The previous one lasted 65,000 for five years of year-round use (Krasnodar)! And it would have lasted even longer, but I got a puncture and decided it was time to change them anyway! Thanks to WB and the seller! I recommend!

    Size:
    215/60 R16 99W XL
    Rate
  • about tyre Kumho Ecsta HS52

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    4.3

    Excellent tires.

    Vehicle:
    Skoda Octavia
    Size:
    205/55 R16 91V
    Buy again?:
    Definitely yes
    City:
    Оренбург
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability