Tyre reviews Kumho Power Max 769. Page 1 37

Decent tires

These tires were on the car from the factory. Let them drive on it, but I wouldn't say it's that "ugly". I have something to compare it to, although I'm comparing incomparable things, but still. Summer native (Kumho), winter (Nokian). On dry and even asphalt, I have no complaints about the tires. Driving in the rain - you need to be VERY careful, as the car on these tires, at a

For two seasons, tread life is more than 50% with a relaxed driving style. Soft, quiet, and affordable. Excellent alternative to Kumho and Amtel, with a similar price tag. Well-balanced, predictable handling on wet pavement at speeds over 90-110 km/h. A bit more worrisome (he drove a Nokian Hakkapeliitta Green at 130-140 km/h on gravel without a hint of skidding). A purely on-highway tire

I bought a car with 58,000 km on the original tires, now it's 148,000 km and it still looks great (6 years old), I want to change them because I have come to understand it's necessary. In short: it grips dry and wet roads at 4+ level, speed of 200 km/h no problem, the car itself is very economical, 6-7 liters on the highway, and this tire also helps with that, I love fishing and

I'm driving a Korean Chevrolet Aveo, 100% summer tires! Don't drive in the winter! Slides in the mud, the car bounces from side to side. Otherwise, I like it. About wet roads and tire blowouts - I've driven 60,000 km and haven't noticed anything. Maybe it's because I drive on dry asphalt and under 140?)))) I'll replace them - I'll buy the same ones.

Quite normal mid-range tires. They are noisy, but tolerable. Hold the road fairly well.
There is a new spare tire from Hyundai Elantra J3 - Kumho Powermax 769 195/60 R15. I can offer it to those who need it for 450 грн or buy it for myself as a pair at the same price.
city of Dnipropetrovsk. 067-5656970

Read all this nonsense. Cheap tires, hold the road perfectly. Never used. Drove for 4 seasons. Tire is intact, no bulges. Fuel-efficient. Holds the road perfectly in the rain. I drive on Marshalls in winter, they are Korean too. Will get the same one or the Kumho KH17 Solus next.

Disadvantages: noisy and aggressive tire. Advantages: wheels are all dented, but no cracks, holds the road normally, not wear-resistant. 65,000 km. The rear pair is still good for 10,000 km, while the front ones will last 1-2 months. If you buy, then not China and if the car has noise insulation.

Below average
Tire is very noisy. During long trips, fatigue is not just doubled from the hum - it's tripled. Up to 100 km/h, it's still somehow acceptable, but if 120-130 km/h, the hum becomes very strong. In winter, on such tires, on rolled snow or black ice, it's better not to drive, there's no grip with the surface.
Pros: maybe the price
Cons: noise, winter is

not bad
strong and stable, accelerated to 200 km per hour held well! It's not Michelin and not Bridgestone, but for its price it's quite okay. For those who don't like it, do some soundproofing of the cabin...
Pros: stable
Cons: weak wear resistance

NOT WORTHY TO BE CALLED A TIRE!!!

DISGUSTING TIRES!!!!!!!!!!!!In the rain, the car just skids and runs out of control, not listening to the steering wheel. On dry pavement, it's eager to skid and wear out heavily. IT'S UNCLEAR WHY IT WAS MADE OR FOR WHOM, it's just a pity for the wasted money, it's better to have KAMA or CORDIAN then! Conclusion: not recommended