Tyre reviews Goodride ZuperEco Z-107. Page 2 2521
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
A normal tire for its price. Even at a pressure of 3, it's quite soft. Minimal noise. I feel confident in the rain. My car weighs 2 tons + 1 ton of cargo and it holds without any consequences. No bulges. It's too early to draw conclusions about its durability. But after a mileage of 15,000 km, no significant wear is noticed. The rear ones are still like new. The only downside is the appearance of barely noticeable stripes on the sidewall - apparently, the places where the rubber was welded. It doesn't affect the performance. Maybe it's due to the increased pressure in the tire. Overall, I'm satisfied with the tire. I didn't expect this from a Chinese-made tire. I've driven many different cars. This one makes an impression of a solid mid-range tire. For regular use, it's more than enough. I hesitated a lot when choosing. The price won me over. I've never regretted it. If you're not a racer or an aggressive driver, you can buy it confidently, it's definitely worth its money.
- Vehicle:
- Renault Trafic
- Size:
- 225/55 R17 101W XL
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Probably due to improper storage, the tires turned out to be UNEVEN. The tire fitter said it's a shame to put them on! But maybe if you drive a bit, it will get better...
I didn't have time to return, replace the tires, and take other actions, I had to go on a long trip.
The two most uneven tires were installed on the rear axle.
At the beginning of operation, the vibration was strongly felt at a speed of 65 to 80 km/h. After driving the first 600 km, the vibration decreased, but after driving 6000 km, it is still felt at a speed of +/- 90 km/h. After 90 km/h (100-120 km/h), the vibration is no longer felt...
- Vehicle:
- Lada 2104
- Size:
- 185/65 R14 86H
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- City:
- Saint Petersburg
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Wore down to the wear indicator in 2 seasons. Can't be compared to Matador or even Continental. Moreover, the driving style is calm.
- Vehicle:
- Renault Duster
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
A good tire for its price.
It handles the road perfectly on both wet and dry asphalt, and there are also no questions about braking. Like any budget tire, it has a very thin sidewall.
The compound is very soft, which is why it has good handling and braking characteristics, but the wear resistance is very weak, especially in hot weather during prolonged driving, the rubber literally crumbles.
Suitable for short trips, but I do not recommend it for long distances in the heat.- Vehicle:
- Kia Carnival
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Have a good day. I decided to try the Gooddide ZuperEco Z-107 tires. Previously, I had Bridgestone Turanza T001 R19. Gooddide is softer, and doesn't throw the car around in ruts like the Bridgestone did. The tires are quite soft and not noisy, as many people write. The sidewall is weak. Almost immediately after purchasing, I hit a pothole, and a small bulge appeared on the sidewall, but it didn't get any bigger. Just in case, I bought a new one. They hold the road well enough, even on wet asphalt, at least I didn't notice (although I did experience aquaplaning on the Bridgestone once, although they were worn out, but not yet to the minimum tread depth). In general, it's not a bad model, considering the cost of 4 pieces is 28,800 for R19. I won't say anything about wear resistance yet. It will be clear after the season.
- Vehicle:
- Mazda 6
- Size:
- 225/45 R19 96W XL
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Yekaterinburg
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought Chinese tires for the first time, having previously scoured the internet. I stopped at this brand because it is part of a holding company that far exceeds all other Chinese holding companies in terms of tire sales. The tires are light, balanced well. I drove to the sea, the impressions are positive. Quiet, excellent rolling, handling and braking on dry roads are excellent. In the rain, of course, it's better to reduce speed. I caught a nasty pothole, the disc was crumpled, but surprisingly, a bulge did not appear, although the rubber is soft.
Previously, I used Pirelli, Continental, Yokohama, Dunlop tires. In conclusion, I can say that these tires are not inferior to global brands, with the exception of wear resistance. They wear out faster, but they also cost one and a half to two times cheaper.
- Vehicle:
- Daewoo Nexia
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
In our time, it's very difficult to choose any product, including tires. What we're used to is no longer accessible. I took a risk and purchased these tires, even though I'm very biased against all Chinese products... But so far, I'm really impressed with these tires. Compared to Continental and Bridgestone, they're lighter, less noisy, and softer. On a wet road, the handling is the same as on a dry one. And the bumps are absorbed much better. At the moment, I'm very pleasantly surprised by the quality of these tires. Time will tell about their long-term characteristics, but for now, I'm completely satisfied with them!
- Vehicle:
- Renault Arkana
- Size:
- 215/60 R17 96V
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Arkhangelsk
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
My personal opinion. I took them in size 215 60 R16. They came in fully worthy. Balancing, camber is normal. The steering wheel does not beat. Not noisy, I don't have additional noise suppressors. They handle potholes within reasonable limits. I caught some, no bulges. Fuel consumption on my 2.4 gasoline manual is normal (those who know the consumption of Grandis). South 1950 km average, mixed 9.5 liters. Handling is worthy, quite. Front wear is due to faulty suspension, rear is normal. Wet snow on the road is like a cow on ice. I installed them in May '23 at a mileage of 365,000. I'm writing this review in November. I'm still on them. At speeds of 140-160, the behavior is quite worthy. I haven't driven on famous brands. In my opinion, they are no worse than Toyo Proxes Malaysia, well, maybe only in terms of handling at speed in the rain. I didn't regret it in terms of price-quality.
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi Grandis
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
The tire is excellent, I had 15R and thought it would be too stiff on a 17R, but strangely it became softer on a 17" - in any case, everything is fine.
- Vehicle:
- Hyundai Elantra
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Velocity characteristics
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Good value for money! These summer tires have proven themselves worthy even on Russian roads. Here are my impressions after a season of operation:
▌ Advantages:
- Price: Affordable cost with decent quality.
- Comfort: Good noise insulation and smooth ride.
- Economy: Low rolling resistance contributes to fuel savings.
- Stability: Excellent handling on dry asphalt, good directional stability.
- Service life: The tread wears out slowly, the wear is even.
▌ Disadvantages:
- Grip on a wet road: In the rain, the grip deteriorates slightly, especially at high speeds.
- Resistance to aquaplaning: Not the best protection against aquaplaning, though tolerable.
In total: I recommend these tires to those who need a reliable option for calm driving in the city and on the highway. If you like an aggressive driving style or often drive in rainy weather, you may want to consider more expensive premium class models.- Vehicle:
- Opel Insignia
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability